XYZ Live #74 – Tim The Soupman Gaslights on Free Speech and Antifa Run RAMPANT

The former head of the Australian KGB, Tim Shitpossum, has written a column claiming that there is no crisis of free speech. We demonstrate conclusively that Tim Soupbum is a dirty rotten liar.

Tim Shitpossum, pictured, leading a white supremacist rally in 1933.

We also discussed the Portland Riot where several conservatives were bashed by Antifa terrorists, including Andy Ngo, editor of Quillette magazine. We pointed out that this was clearly a premeditated attack for his site’s exposure of the web of collusion between Antifa and the MSM, and a warnig to others who oppose the left, on the same weekend that James Fields was wrongfully imprisoned, that anybody who opposes them is their target.

We will likely start at 9:00 pm AEST again next week. Find us at Matty Rose Live.

Change.org petition: Save South African Farmer Nicky and her family

There is currently a petition on change.org to support a South African family who are trying to move to Australia on humanitarian grounds. The petition has nearly 15,000 signatures, and you can add your own here.

Below is their story, lifted from the petition page:

Nicky lived happily on a farm with her husband and children until a year ago when their lives were shattered in a brutal farm attack.

Nicky was raped and shot in front of her three children in this horrific farm attack. After the attack they lodged an application to the Australian government for a humanitarian visa to allow them to move to safety and a new life. They were hopeful that this will be approved after the comments of support for South African farmers by Minister Peter Dutton and other Australian Members of Parliament.

They recently received notice that the application has been declined and we are questioning why Australia rejected the humanitarian visa application made for her and her traumatised family.

We urge Minister David Coleman to overturn this decision and to allow Nicky, her husband and family entry into Australia to start a new life in safety.

Follow this link for more information on the brutal attack:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/shot-mum-raped-attacker-who-16529925

The XYZ understands that a petition organiser has been blocked by Facebook for posting the petition.

The following is my own opinion.

South Africa is the template for what awaits Australia. The white descendents of the Europeans who founded the nation have become a minority. The gang of non-whites who currently rule follow an ideology of grievance-based Marxism, and they carry out a steady policy of extortion, theft and genocide.

Allowing white South Africans to come as refugees to Australia is a crucial short term step if we are to save lives but it is not a long term solution, because the same globalist cancer which is destroying South Africa is also destroying Australia.

If the anti-white policy continues in South Africa, the only viable solution will be a seperatist movement for an Independent West Cape. It is unlikely that this will be allowed to occur peacefully, thus it is highly likely that at some point in the near future white South Africans (possibly alongside coloured minorities) will have to fight for their right to independence and survival as a people.

Having said this, I have signed the petition, in the hope that the Europeans of South Africa and Australia will soon take back our respective countries, and Nicky and her family can safely move back to their homeland.

James Fields sentenced to life in prison for thoughtcrime

James Field is a young man who had been attempting to drive home from the Unite the Right protest in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 12, 2017 before he was attacked by Antifa terrorists, who hit his car with weapons, and accidentally ploughed into a crowd of Antifa terrorists. An overweight radical far left extremist terrorist, Heather Heyer, who was narrowly missed by the car had a heart attack and died.

This week, James Fields has been convicted of her murder and sentenced to life in prison.

From the Washington Post:

CHARLOTTESVILLE — Nearly two years after James A. Fields Jr. rammed his car into a crowd of counterprotesters at a white-supremacist rally here, the avowed neo-Nazi and convicted murderer apologized in court Friday as a judge sentenced him to life in prison for 29 federal hate crimes.

“Every day I think about how things could have gone differently, and how I regret my actions,” he said in a packed courtroom. “I am sorry.”

Fields, 22, whose vehicular attack killed one woman and injured 35 other people, pleaded guilty to the 29 counts in April in a deal with prosecutors, who agreed to drop an additional charge that carries a possible death sentence. In a separate case stemming from the deadly incident, Fields was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes in December by a Virginia jury that voted for a life term plus 419 years in state prison.

It appears that like Philip Arps, the man sentenced to 21 months in prison for sharing a video of the Christchurch incident, James Fields has been convicted and sentenced on the basis of his views:

In a sentencing memo filed in court by the U.S. attorney’s office in Charlottesville, prosecutor Christopher R. Kavanaugh called the attack “domestic terrorism.”

“The defendant’s crimes were so horrendous, and the maiming of innocents so severe, that they outweigh any factors” that Fields might cite in seeking leniency, Kavanaugh wrote. “This is particularly true in light of the fact that he has demonstrated that he feels no remorse for his actions and continues to espouse his hateful ideology.”

The 50-page document quotes a recorded phone call by Fields from the Albemarle Regional Jail in Charlottesville on Dec. 7, 2017, almost four months after the rally, in which he refers to Bro, Heyer’s mother. Bro has been outspoken since her daughter’s death, calling for healing and reconciliation in the community.

“She is a communist,” the memo quotes Fields as saying on the phone with his mother. “An anti-white, liberal . . . It’s not up for questioning. She’s the enemy.”

“Nobody is the enemy,” his mother replied.

“She is the enemy,” Fields insisted before cursing at his mother to stop questioning him.

[A profile of James A. Fields Jr.]

In the filing, Kavanaugh detailed Fields’s professed admiration for the militarism and racial purity doctrine of Nazi Germany — a fascination that has been well documented over the past two years in court testimony and media reports. The memo offers new details, though, including about Fields’s trip to Germany with high school classmates.

“When the group visited the Dachau concentration camp, the defendant said, ‘This is where the magic happened,’ and then skipped happily down the train tracks that transported Jewish prisoners to the camp,” Kavanaugh wrote about a classmate’s recollection.

“When they visited the gas chambers . . . the defendant stated, ‘It’s almost like you can still hear them screaming,’ ” the memo says. Quoting a classmate who went on the trip, Kavanaugh said Fields was “elated and happy” when he made the statement.

On Friday, prosecutors also showed the judge details of Fields’s social media activity in the months before the attack, including scores of violently racist Twitter and Instagram posts. He regularly used the hashtag #Hitlerwasright.

It is highly likely that James Fields pled guilty so as to avoid the death penalty. Below is a compilation of evidence various authors at The XYZ have put together to make the case that James Fields is innocent.

——

Richard B Riddick

It’s very important that the media do not give a platform to violent extremists, particularly ones who carry out violence for political purposes and would use the platform to extend their intimidation.

To whom am I referring?

The ABC of course, who in their recent gushing coverage of “Redneck Revolt” managed to portray this group of left-wing fanatics as a natural and righteous reaction to the election of Donald Trump and the rise of the Alt-right.

I believe in free speech, so I am actually more than happy for these would be class revolutionaries to go on the record with their views, all the better to hoist them on their own petards.

However what I don’t like is the fact that my taxes go to literal agitprop like the following:

It shouldn’t need to be said, but the above picture isn’t a counter demonstrator participating in the American democratic process, it’s a man committing assault with a deadly weapon on a person exercising their 1st amendment rights.

When you are trying to intimidate others into not exercising their right to political expression, you are a terrorist. The literal definition of terrorism is violence for a political purpose.

I digress.

Back to the Australian media.

So, recently the media, the blue-tick mark cultural influencers and the social media twits have all gone into a fit of rage over Blair Cottrell being interviewed. I have covered most of my thoughts about Blair specifically in this piece, however it did get me thinking when I was reading the ABC Antifa piece about the significance of the primary interviewee, Dwayne Dixon.

Excerpts from the ABC piece are as follows:

“Softly-spoken and slight of build, Mr Dixon is a vegan who spends his days lecturing in anthropology at a local university.

“Today he’s preparing for the moment he may raise a deadly weapon on the streets of a US city.

“Guns are a tool,” he says between bursts of crackling gunfire.

“You’d rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.”

….

“Mr Dixon, 45, is a member of the far-left group Redneck Revolt, whose chapters have multiplied in the past year from just a handful to over 30 across the United States, they claim.”

….

“I think for us having access to weapons and having the skill and competency with them … allows us to at least consider that among a diversity of possible tactics,” Mr Dixon says.

“It doesn’t mean that they’re going to be used all the time, but recognising the moment we’re in, when real white terrorist violence is a fact of American life.

“I wish we didn’t have them, didn’t need them, but I think a wise deterrent is not something to scorn.

“None of us think about firearms in a cavalier way,” Mr Dixon insists, before heading back to the firing line to help his friends reload their guns.”

“Redneck Revolt had their guns in Charlottesville but never fired them.”

I was contemplating the implicit escalation inherent in this man’s language and what “diversity of possible tactics” might mean, when I came across the following story:

Armed Antifa PROFESSOR Admits to Chasing Charlottesville Driver With Rifle BEFORE DEADLY CRASH!

“Dwayne Dixon, a University of North Carolina anthropology professor and leader of the armed Antifa group Redneck Revolt, has admitted to chasing James Alex Fields Jr. with a rifle just before he drove into a group of protesters — killing Heather Heyer.”

“This new revelation adds some insight into what was happening in the moments leading up to the fatal incident.

“In a Facebook post by Dixon on January 7, obtained by the Gateway Pundit, he wrote:

“I take perverse pleasure in having carried this Spike’s lower in the defense of Justice Park on August 12th. I used this rifle to chase off James Fields from our block of 4th St before he attacked the marchers to the south. Spike’s needs a good lesson in ethics and antifascism.”

The Aussie media is tearing itself apart over interviewing Blair Cottrell, but they literally interviewed a man who admits to “chasing off” James Fields just prior to his involvement in the car crash that killed Heather Heyer.

At the bottom of this piece is the XYZ coverage of the Charlottesville crash incident, I implore you to re-read it in light of this information, but I will summarize, at the time we raised the possibility that James Alex Fields was not a murderer.

Primarily because that implied intent, and if he intended to kill enemies of the Alt-Right he could’ve done so more effectively by bringing a firearm or crashing his car into the crowd itself proper and not the car in front of him.

A key event in the video footage shows a man hitting the back of Fields’ car with a metal bat.

It was the contention of the initial XYZ piece that perhaps the sound of the man attacking the back of James’ car startled him into accelerating down the street, therefore causing the car crash. However given that we now know from Dwayne Dixon’s Facebook, that he used his rifle to scare off James Fields immediately before the crash, and specifically that he scared him off from a block on Fourth Street, and the crash where Heather Heyer died occurred at the mall on Water and Fourth streets.

Here is my updated theory:

  1. James Fields was leaving in his automobile after participating in the Unite the Right rally.
  2. James Fields turned onto a street whereby he was confronted with the Redneck Revolt, Dwayne Dixon recognized Fields as a member of the alt-right due to hair cut/clothing and “chased him off” with a rifle, perhaps by pointing it at him or otherwise menacing him (we know no gunfire occurred).
  3. James, presumably very nervous at this point (after the menacing of Redneck revolt and spending most of the day at the Alt-Right shield wall) turned Southwards onto 4th street.
  4. He can see ahead of him a large crowd of people who are obviously not Alt-right.
  5. As he progresses up the street he hears a loud bang in his own vehicle (the man striking his vehicle from the outside with the bat, likely loudly breaking the tail light).

Is it possible that James thinks he has been fired on? Is it possible that he accelerated out of fear?

This new revelation is just further proof to me that James didn’t intend to kill anyone that day. He might be guilty of gross negligence whilst panicking, but that certainly doesn’t fit the narrative the Leftist media have constructed of a murderous right winger.

In any event, surely it should raise some eyebrows that the ABC thinks giving a platform to a man who openly brags about intimidating his political enemies with firearms?

Maybe not though, it is after all, their ABC.

Previous XYZ piece on James Alex Fields

Twenty year old James Alex Fields was the driver of the Challenger involved in the crash that killed Heather Heyer and injured others, he has been denied bail and charged with second degree murder, three counts of malicious wounding, and one count related to leaving the scene.

The media has interviewed his former teachers and class mates and ascertained that James held many Alt-Right and Nazi views and sympathies.

The various media reports were essentially “a car driven by a Nazi has killed one and injured others, before fleeing the scene”.

Now I’m not contending that the facts don’t support the above media report. The evidence is that James Fields does hold those views and he certainly was the driver of the Challenger when it rammed two vehicles into a crowd of protestors. The problem is that the implicit assumptions being made by the media or by the rest of society to fill in blanks around the facts are at best negligent and at worst corruptly malicious.

Firstly, it seems many commentators are saying that the crash was the intention of James and even premeditated based on a quote from Charlottesville police chief Al Thomas:

“The premeditated violence that our community experienced today was completely unacceptable.”

It is my view that the Police chief was talking more generally about violence at the Unite the Right rally because it seems unlikely that the Police had established already that James had planned to carry out the car crash. Further, even if they had established this, it seems unlikely that they would say this publicly and potentially influence the future jurors before James’ trial.

The idea that James planned this only makes sense if the evidence is that James is a literal idiot. If he sought to kill people opposed to the Alt-right and he planned to do so before attending the rally, why did he decide to do so via a method that was inefficient and left him easily exposed to retaliation? Why did he not use a firearm or a bomb? Either James is literally so stupid that he was unable to realise that a gun or bomb would have allowed him to kill more people more efficiently with less risk to himself, or he didn’t pre-plan the attack prior to the event.

Therefore, assuming James isn’t a literal idiot, he did not premeditate the crash before the event.

Did he intend the crash though? Was he so infuriated by what he saw on the day of the Rally that he decided that the counter-protestors needed to be killed with whatever means were available to him at that time? That’s possible I suppose, it’s even more compelling if the media are constantly shoving stories in your face saying that he was a Nazi or that he threatened his mum with knife when he was 13 or 14. Of course it’s equally possible that he was just a deeply troubled kid, given that he grew up without a father due to a drunk driver.

Let’s go to the video footage though and assess the facts.

Video 1:

Video 2:

So in the first video, at the very beginning, literally the first few seconds while the car and James are still a fair way from the crowd and cars that are eventually to be struck, there is an impact sound and what sounds like tyres spinning. James and his Challenger continue further down the street before a man on the street attacks the backside of the Challenger as it passes him with some sort of club or bat, then the crash occurs.

The second video shows the challenger ramming another car, it’s this second car that pushes a third car that actually impacts the crowd. It doesn’t appear that there is anyone between the challenger and the rammed car.

So what do these facts mean?

If you believe that James intended to crash to kill the protestors, you are also implying that he was too stupid or stricken with rage to think of of mounting the curb to avoid the slow moving car in front of him, despite the fact that doing so would have meant hitting a large mass of people, and therefore more fatalities and causalities.

My view is that James did not intend to crash his car and kill counter-protestors at all that day.

Rather I believe that the impact and tyre spinning that occurs at the beginning of the first video is the aftermath of something striking James’ Challlenger, and his rapidly accelerating briefly, hence the tyre spin. Whether it was the sound of something striking the Challenger heard by James in the cab that panicked him into accelerating, or he was actively seeking escape is unclear. Then further down the street and crucially before the crash, James’ Challenger is hit on the backside by the man with club/bat (0.03 in the first video).

Interestingly, this man who attacks the car does so on very little notice, that is, James’ car has only been in his view for a very short time before he decides to attack it on the way past, barely a couple of seconds. My view is that this man has seen that James car was attacked further up the street and decided to do so as well, or that he has looked into the front window of the Challenger and seen that James is wearing a white polo or has a haircut like all the Alt-Right rally participants do, and has decided to attack the car.

In either case, James has now been attacked twice (if you accept that the first sound was an attack) or that he has been attacked at least once (which we know for an absolute fact) and is now hemmed in on the street. He also knows that he has been attacked on the basis that people outside the car have identified him as being an Alt-Right rally participant and in front of him down the street is an entire crowd of people anti the Alt-right who have weapons.

The above image is a meme that is circulating, it shows the moment of the attack caught on video at 0.03, we can see from the position of the street signs in each photo, that James was braking before his car was struck.

This to me is further proof that James was not intending to crash into anyone, why would you brake if you were intending to maximise damage to your victims?

My view is that after the bat/club attack, James panics and accelerates rapidly, given that no-one appeared to be caught between the Challenger and the slow/stationary car, it stands to reason that there was actually no one in front of James when he began his acceleration. Once again affirming that James was seeking to escape, not kill.

Video 3:

Video 4:

The above videos show the crash occurring from the street and from drone coverage above, we can see that the vehicles that actually hit the crowd are the two vehicles pushed by James’ Challenger.

These two vehicles would both have been in low gears edging slowly through the crowd, whilst counter protestors walked around and infront of them, hence why the impact of James’ Challenger pushed them both so far so rapidly. The cars weren’t parked or braking, and due to being in first gear wouldn’t have resisted the forward movement of the impact of James’ Challenger at all.

Given that a Dodge Challenger is a notoriously powerful car and that it’s possible (and in my opinion very likely) that in James’ panic he pushed the pedal to the floor for a few brief seconds after the bat attack, it’s not surprising that the impact had the effect it did.

So what does this mean? it means that James isn’t a murderer and is not guilty of malicious harming due to lack of intent. Furthermore, if James can prove that he personally had a reasonable fear of being stuck in his car whilst being attacked, his attempts to escape no matter how extreme in the aftermath are not criminally chargeable. They are criminally chargeable though if it can be proved that it was unreasonable for him to attempt the method he chose, which may result in him being guilty of manslaughter and reckless negligence causing harm. But given he had already been attacked in his own vehicle on the street, and he is likely to have witnessed violence earlier in the day at the Rally, it stands to reason he had a reasonable fear of being murdered or harmed given the numbers of potential enemies and their armaments. Once again, look at the below video after the crash, many of the people who rush in to attack his car had weapons so this was not an unrealistic fear.

Furthermore, James’ charge of fleeing the scene would be thrown out immediately as James can easily prove that he fled for fear of being pulled out of his car and lynched by an angry mob who were unlikely to listen to any explanation he might offer.

Needless to say “Nazi’s panicked attempts to escape attacks cause the death of one and multiple injuries” is certainly not a headline that the media wants to run with, as they don’t want anyone to question whether James’ actions could be justified.

All of this evidence and reasoning that I have laid out here will come into the public discourse during the trial and will be used to establish reasonable doubt, and James will be released or at least not found guilty of having intent, only of negligence. Assuming of course James can still get a fair trial in today’s America.

At that point the Left will have a moment of extreme mental anguish, when their narrative of James being an”evil Nazi killer” dissolves to be replaced by “a panicked man fleeing a car accident after being assaulted”. In this moment lies the greatest risk; instead of reflecting on why their bias and assumptions led them to a deeply incorrect conclusion not supported by facts, they will say that the system is rigged and that this was not justice.

Given that they already believe a literal Nazi (Trump) is in the White House, and their rhetoric for over 50 years is that the system is perpetuated and maintained by evil whites who are in power, they will instead step up their revolutionary and violent efforts.

This incident and its fallout is but another another nail in the coffin of America’s modern political discourse, and I fear that we are rapidly approaching the point of no return.

The Uncuckables: Ep. 16 Christian Emergency

On Thursday we went to air just as Israel Folau was being interviewed by Alan Jones on Sky News. In explaining why he put his post on social media imploring sinners to repent in order to avoid hell, Folau explained that if he had a child who was on drugs he would do everything he could to steer him to the right path, so he does with sinners.

Yours truly predicted that lefties would be screaming the next day about Folau comparing homosexuality to drug addiction. Sure enough:

Even Mr “I’m not a leftie.” XYZ predicts the future.

We also discussed:

  • The report by Project Veritas which confirmed what we already knew, that Google and YouTube have been deliberately manipulating their algorithm to limit the reach of conservative news outlets and commentators.
  • Sydney Council declares a national emergency on so-called “climate change” and everybody else ROFL’d.
  • A mentally disturbed person who dressed as a dragon and read to children at a public library in America has a prior conviction for abusing a child. Never saw it coming.
  • Donald Trump stares down the military industrial complex to stave off war with Iran for another week.

Join us every Thursday evening at 8:30 pm AEST at The Uncuckables.

Israel Folau’s fight is a class action for all Christians

The social justice rage mob is so insidious because what they can do to one person sends a message to an entire people. These far left internet extremists have destroyed countless careers, and on the streets their terrorist comrades have physically assaulted opponents of the far left.

The cumulative effect of this terrorism is that through fear, public and private organisations now require their employees to sign contracts pledging them to abide by rules set by these far left violent extremists. This applies to both online activity and IRL activity. We all understand that there are things we cannot say or do in public without receiving severe consequences. Because we have signed contracts, if we bring up the issue of freedom of speech the far left will claim this is not about freedom of speech, but about breach of contract. Moreover, the far left does not view the requirement to sign such contracts as shoving their opinions down everybody’s throats, because they consider their own opinions to be neutral.

Thus the far left currently controls the discourse in our civilisation and works relentlessly to gaslight us and indoctrinate the next generation. Even those of us who try to search for the truth are hampered by the digital gatekeepers because organisations such as Google and Facebook are staffed to the brim with these same far left extremists.

No one man can stand alone against this current. However, if one man is prepared to stand and is supported by the still defiant masses, we may all have a fighting chance.

Enter Israel Folau.

From the Australian:

The Australian Christian Lobby fundraising campaign for Israel Folau has raised more money in less than 24 hours than the shutdown GoFundMe appeal did over four days.

The second fundraising campaign has already amassed more than $810,000 in donations, just a day after it was launched by the ACL.

The organisation set up the fundraising campaign for the former Wallabies star on its website after Folau’s successful GoFundMe page was closed by the US-based crowd-funding platform yesterday.

By 1.30pm, $712,000 had been donated via the link on the ACL site — with the group also promising to tip in $100,000 of their own money.

Folau launched his GoFundMe appeal for $3 million on Friday and had raised $750,000 in four days from more than 7000 donors. But the fundraising platform pulled the campaign yesterday, saying it violated their terms of service and announced it would refund all donations.

“As a company, we are absolutely committed to the fight for equality for LGBTIQ+ people and fostering an environment of inclusivity. While we welcome GoFundMe’s engaging in diverse civil debate, we do not tolerate the promotion of discrimination or exclusion,” GoFundMe Australia’s regional manager Nicola Britton said.

Put simply, GoFundMe is happy to discriminate against and exclude a Christian who openly states his Christian beliefs in breach of a contract which forced him to silence his Christian beliefs.

Far left extremists have argued that it is unfair for Folau to crowdfund his legal campaign because this is all about him losing his job, and he is a rich sportsman who can afford the bill. News.com went so low as to complain that more money was raised for Folau than for a kid with cancer. Fight for your freedom of speech and you are stealing from a dying child? This is an absolute dog act from news.com.

This also ignores the following:

Folau’s push to raise a legal war chest to defend his religious beliefs was deemed unworthy by GoFundMe and a “violatio­n” of the company’s values. But the US crowd-funding site cheerfully backed a trans­gender Australian nurse to have “vocal feminisation surgery’.

A doomed quest by a 20-year-old Perth man to raise $500,000 to buy a Ferrari also got the ­platform’s seal of approval.

Also as David Hilton pointed out, these people literally crowdfund to murder children:

Israel Folau is a man with a high profile and even higher convictions. Regardless of his generous renumeration, the requirement forced upon him toe the SJW line on social media is manifestly unjust. He is prepared to lose everything in order to challenge and bring down this unjust system, and he has inspired the masses to support him, because he actually has a fighting chance of winning.

The left are currently throwing the kitchen sink at Israel Folau precisely because they understand that he has a chance of winning. They have even gone after his wife. This is not about Israel Folau’s career. This is about challenging the system which forces everyday Aussies to shut their mouths for fear of losing their livelihoods. It is essentially a class action on behalf of all Christians in support of our God-given right to freedom of religion. If Folau wins it will set the precedent that organisations cannot force people to silence themselves or act against their Christian convictions in order to appease the Bolshevism of so-called “tolerance” and “inclusion”.

It would be an actual victory in the Culture War, as opposed to the occasional political victory which just leads to more cultural retreat:

Bad Scott.

The momentum gained from such a cultural victory (and a potentially successful appeal by Cardinal George Pell) could see Christians and patriots push back and win further cultural victories. We could repeal fake marriage. Outlaw the murder of babies and old people. Stop immigration.

Take back our countries.

One last thing.

The left have tried to make an example of Israel Folau. Just like they went after Kanye West, they want to show the little people that if it can happen to someone at the pinnacle, it can happen to you. Nothing will save you from the SJW rage mob.

If Folau wins, we should make examples of everybody involved in making an example of him. Raelene Castle. Nicola Britton. Rob Solomon. Alan Joyce. Take them for every penny they have.

You can donate to Israel Folau here.

XYZ Live #72 – Censorship BEAST takes over the AFL!

Nationalist memes have been seeping their way into real life for several years now, and this weekend at the footy the kind censorship that nationalists have been receiving suddenly hit middle Australia smack bang in the face.

As usual, we hope that this is the start of something big, and provides further spark to the nationalist revolt in the West, especially in Australia.

You will find us each Monday night at 9:15 pm AEDT at Matty Rose Live.

Jeff Kennett offers mild civnat critique of AFL Behavioural Awareness Officers

The AFL has been slammed by everybody in Australia with an IQ over 12 for its deployment of Thought Police, euphemistically referred to as Behavioural Awareness Officers, at the footy. Basically, everybody agrees that the AFL is run by complete wankers.

From the Australian:

Victorian Opposition Leader Michael O’Brien yesterday decried­ a “nanny state” mentality ­encroaching on the code.

“You know what? It’s not the opera. It’s not the ballet. People are allowed to cheer. People are ­allowed to shout. People are ­allowed to even boo occasionally,” he said.

“I just hope that the AFL gets the balance right and they don’t get too heavy-handed on this, ­because you don’t want to see the spark, the joy that a footy match provides, being taken away.”

Hawthorn legend Dermott Brereton described the use of the “Behavioural Awareness” officers as “the most ridiculous principle the AFL has instituted in years’’.

“It really angered me to see that,’’ he said. “How ridiculous to infringe on people’s basic human rights to go along and enjoy their lifestyle, the way they have for over 100 years.’’

It is refreshing to see this high level pushback. The question is whether or not the pushback can be sustained and determined. If the AFL finds a way to quietly institute this policy in a few years time when we have all forgotten about it, it will all be for nothing, just like every other cuckservative pushback.

This is why the comments of former Victorian Premier and sometimes cuck Jeff Kennett matter:

Mr Kennett yesterday warned AFL bosses were “playing with fire” with “sanctioned censorship” of fans.

The Hawthorn president warned AFL bosses their sanctione­d censorship of fans could ­ignite a dangerous backlash after security staff were accused of ­intimidation at matches in Melbourne­ on the weekend.

“If the AFL is going to be the ­adjudicators of how people are participating in the game … or there is an ‘expression force’ that is coming in to tell people what they can say, they are playing with fire,” the former Victorian premier told The Australian.

“The more the AFL tells the public whether they can boo or not, the more likely they are to go the other way. We have been doing it for 150 years, for goodness sake.”

Spot on, and good choice of words which highlight the Soviet nature of this idiotic policy. Kennett’s interview on 3AW this morning is where it gets interesting:

Earlier today, Mr Kennett highlighted the ethnic background of the staff during a 3AW interview.

I’m not being racist when I say this, but when I saw some of the footage, the people who are making judgments while they wear these authoritative coats, are not people who appear to have a great knowledge of our game,” he told host Neil Mitchell.

“And yet they make judgments about what’s correct and not correct.”

Almost there, Jeff. Come over to the light.

Asked by Mitchell what he meant, Mr Kennett said: “Well, they’re new arrivals to Australia, it appears.”

Mitchell replied: “We don’t know that.”

“We don’t know that and they could be born here,” Mr Kennett said.

“All I’m saying, is the sporting arena is where people relax, where they support their tribe, and what is happening now is unacceptable.”

After the interview, Mitchell said: “I don’t think ethnicity has anything to do with this at all.”

Of course you don’t Neil, you friggin’ boomer.

Asked by The Australian whether he stood by his comments, Mr Kennett was unapologetic, saying he hoped Marvel Stadium’s decision to introduce behaviour awareness officers to control crowds at AFL matches “gets knocked on the head very quickly”.

“The footage I saw was of people who — I don’t know whether they were Australian-born or whether they weren’t, but I suspect they weren’t,” he said.

“How is anyone going to judge anyone else’s behaviour, let alone people who were probably weren’t born here, don’t know the code, probably don’t play it?

“Do they support a football team? How could they possibly have any understanding of our sport? Some of them have come from countries where they play soccer, and some from countries where no sport is played?

“Are we going to just employ security guards or people monitors without any experience at all to come along and sit in judgment of people who have been going to football matches all their lives?”

Obviously to the usual blue tick crowd this kind of talk makes Jeff Kennett literally Hitler, so more power to him. To the average middle Aussie, this kind of talk is like stale bread to a starving man. We are not allowed to talk about race, so the moment somebody does, even when the words are as carefully chosen as this, something stirs in us because we are acknowledging a part of ourselves that we usually have to deny.

Points to Kennett for having the guts to talk about race and for refusing to back away from his comments. The problem is that Kennett has taken the usual cuckservative option when talking about race – he focuses on culture. It leaves wriggle room for the globalist AFL to propose making sure sure they employ foreign invaders who have fully integrated into the Australian way of life, or to provide cultural sensitivity training to those who haven’t.

It leaves open the potential to be tied in knots over where to draw the line between good immigrants who assimilate and bad ones who can’t or won’t. And it gives respectability to the invented term of “racism”; the term “racism” is an anti-white slur which was invented by globalist communist internationalists as a tool with which to undermine the ethnic homogeneity of white nations.

The foreigners employed by the AFL to tell real Australians to watch their mouths are not Australian, they do not belong here and they must go back. Australia was founded in order to provide a homeland for the Anglo-Celtic progeny of the British Empire, and this is enshrined in our Constitution. The purpose for Australia’s founding was betrayed by Liberal and Labor governments which opened the doors to immigration from outside our homeland without our consent.

Thus the image of foreigners ordering our people to keep their mouths shut at football matches, and kicking us out if we don’t obey, is a disgraceful symbol of our slavery to political correctness and the demographic replacement it is intended to achieve.

This image:

This is why we have to talk about race. And go all the way.

Behavioural Awareness Officers are the KGB of PC Australia

In the Soviet Union (the second most murderous regime of the 20th century) the small group of ideologically driven people who ran the abattoir cycled through many acronyms for the state’s Thought Police; Cheka, NKVD and KGB were the most well known.

Nobody knows the acronym for the Thought Police in China (the most murderous regime of the 20th century) because it is written in their ridiculous script, but we do know that when foreign devil journalists recently attempted to ask the local students milling around Tiananmen Square if they knew what happened there 30 years ago, many young Chinese literally ran away from said hacks.

Best. Thought Police. Ever.

As George Orwell has taught us, the more benign the acronym, the more terrifying the Thought Police. Vladimir Ilyich Ulianov and Lev Bronstein would have wet their pants at “Behavioural Awareness Officer”.

From the Age:

AFL fans are outraged at “behavioural awareness officers” patrolling the crowd at Friday night’s game between Essendon and Hawthorn, but Marvel Stadium says they’ve been in place all year.

We have always been at war with Eurasia.

It follows the ejection of a supporter who allegedly ran towards umpire Mathew Nicholls while calling him a “bald-headed flog” at half-time of the Carlton-Brisbane Lions match last Saturday.

“Ran towards”? Give that the writer has carefully avoided using the term “on the field” we can assume he didn’t even invade the pitch. Regardless, “bald-headed flog” must be the mildest thing anybody has ever said to an umpire.

People have taken to social media to complain after a photo was shared showing two AIG Security guards wearing vests labelled “Behavioural Awareness Officer”.

Essendon Football Club recruiting consultant and former AFL coach Robert Shaw tweeted a photo of the officers with: “40 years in the game and played, coached and spectated at some inhospitable (wonderful) rival grounds. This is a first for me. Have we really got to this? So sad if we have.”

It should surprise nobody that Angela Pippos, of far left propaganda outfit the ABC fame, tweeted the following reply:

This is code for “one more outburst like that and it is Siberia for you and your family”. Seriously Angela, go back to Russia.

Fans responded that it was “embarrassing” and “political correctness gone into new levels not seen”.

The officers’ vests feature a phone number to “report antisocial behaviour”.

Behavioural Awareness Officers, seen at the weekend’s game. Source.

A fan tweeted he was “surprised no one has called the hotline and dobbed in two blokes walking around trying to ruin everyone’s fun”.

One Instagram user asked whether there were Winx-like odds that the behavioural awareness officers would get the “bald-headed flog treatment” next time.

They could try, but given that from what I saw on the TV, these Thought Police tended to look remarkably similar to the people hired to make sure nobody entering the ground (or an airport) is a terrorist, it would probably land you with a charge of so-called “racism”.

For several decades after the end of the Second Great Brother War we Australians prided ourselves on the idea that we were in the freest country in the free world. Now Russians and Eastern Europeans who have moved to the West regularly state that the formal and informal speech codes which have become part and parcel of life here remind them of the USSR.

Naturally, the powers that be tried to deny that it is even happening:

Marvel Stadium chief executive Michael Green said the behavioural awareness officers had been in place all year.

“They have been called ‘behavioural awareness officers’ and worn those same vests all year,” he said.

We have always been at war with Eastasia.

Hawthorn supporter Vic Ghiller told The Age the officers were at Marvel Stadium Friday night.

“They were actually patrolling the Hawthorn cheer squad and telling supporters to calm down,” he said.

“As a long-term follower of AFL, I am losing interest in AFL and seriously thinking of only attending VFL as it’s more user friendly.”

This guy is onto it. Aussie footy codes have lost the plot. Our first course of action must be to boycott the AFL. It should be understood however that a mass boycott will do nothing to change the AFL. Its totalitarian behaviour will only get worse.

Australia’s slide into tyranny will not be stopped until we arrest every single political leader, corporate leader, academic, journalist, and social justice warrior in the country and put them on trial for treason. For said trials I suggest we resurrect the soul of Iona Nikitchenko, the notorious Soviet judge who presided over the show trials which occurred during Stalin’s purges and after WW2.

Their guilt is already established. The whole idea is to secure quick and just punishment for the crime.

The Uncuckables: Ep 14. Mining and Web Construction

The Dusty Bogan joined us on Thursday night for a chat, and we just started to scratch the surface of the ideological differences between his civic nationalism and the ethnic nationalism of The XYZ.

For the second half, Matty’s Modern Life joined us by Skype and the Unshackled’s Steel Archer took over fom Tim Wilms to discuss the protests in Hong Kong. Matty framed the issue in terms of nationalism, with the Cantonese of Hong Kong being of a different race, language and culture to the Han Chinese.

We also discussed again the escalation in censorship by YouTube and the dying Social Media.