Hail Boris

Boris Johnson has been elected to keep Great Britain white.

Along with Nigel Farage, Boris was a leading public figure in the effort to get Great Britain out of the European Union. We could go over a lot of complicated, boring reasons why Great Britain left the EU, such as its desire for greater political autonomy, or the increasing authoritarianism and micromanagement of the EU, but the number one reason Britons voted to leave the EU was the desire to get their country back.

Indigenous Britons are on course to becoming a minority in their own country, and are faced with the prospect of living in an Islamic Britain. Leaving the EU is the first step in being able to stem the flow of people crossing legally and illegally into Great Britain. If Great Britain is to have a border, it has to be independent.

The odd Battle of Britain veteran can point out that this isn’t the Britain they fought for but in general, Britons aren’t really supposed to say this. But once you clear away all the fluff, race was precisely what Brexit was about, even f Poms couldn’t or weren’t allowed to articulate it as such.

This is why Remoaners label Brexiteers as “racist”. An establishment British government would never actually allow the British people a direct vote on immigration, but both sides understand that at the end of the day, despite all the discussion of the democratic deficit or the ridiculous regulations on the shape of vegetables or what constitutes chocolate, Brexit was about race, immigration, and the desire to keep Britain British.

Thus the globalist David Cameron fell as Prime Minister because he made the mistake of giving the British people a vote on race by default. Now the globalist Theresa May has fallen because her mission to keep Great Britain in the EU for as long as possible has run its course. Brexit was Great Britain’s Trump moment. Now, Great Britain has its Trump.

From the Australian:

Britain’s new pro-Brexit prime minister Boris Johnson has promised to bring peace to his warring Conservatives, ignite a national spirit of can-do and defeat ­Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn in a rousing speech after winning the party leadership.

A tranche of bitter Remainer MPs from the Tory party is threatening to scupper Mr Johnson as soon as he is sworn in by the Queen tomorrow, demanding he row back from his Brexit ultimatum of taking the country out of the EU on October 31 even without a deal.

But moments after being announced as the new leader of the Conservative Party, Mr Johnson was defiant, saying: “This pivotal moment in our history, we again have to reconcile two sets of ­instincts, two noble sets of instincts, between the deep desire for friendship and free trade and ­mutual support in security and ­defence between Britain and our European partners, and the simultaneous desire — equally deep and heartfelt — for democratic self-government in this country.’’

That is code for keeping Great Britain white. He has to speak in code. Yes, it is a dog whistle, a dog whistle for truth and for the right of the British people to have their own nation.  National sovereignty is “racism”.  So be it.

Boris faces a mountain of challenges. He has enemies within:

The restive Remainer backbenchers — who number about 40 — will now scrutinise Mr Johnson’s statements over the next few days before deciding whether they will force a constitutional crisis.

Mr Johnson’s choice of chancellor, foreign secretary, Brexit secretary and home secretary will also send a signal about how ­inclusive he intends to be, or whether he wants to try to steamroll Brexit through.

The situation is so fragile that in the coming months the Queen could be asked to defy centuries-old tradition and prorogue parliament; some Tories — believing a no-deal Brexit would be so calamitous to the nation that they will ­extinguish their own political ­futures — could cross the floor to support a no-­confidence motion; or there could be a snap general election…

Johnson has inherited May’s disastrous decisions — including the election of 2016 when she lost her large majority, meaning the Conservatives rule only with the confidence and supply of Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party.

The slim working majority is down to two, and with some Remainer MP’s facing future de-selection at grassroots level, they will have little to lose to try and torpedo Johnson’s plans.

As usual, Greg Sheridan’s analysis of the domestic situation is sound.

Boris also has enemies without.

From the Washington Post:

When Johnson clocks in, he will face an overflowing in-tray of items that need urgent attention, including a showdown in the Persian Gulf with a belligerent Iran. The two countries have been in a tense standoff since Britain impounded an Iranian tanker suspected of sending oil to Syria, and Iran retaliated by seizing a British-flagged oil tanker last week.

Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, congratulated Johnson on Tuesday. “Iran does not seek confrontation,” Zarif tweeted. “But we have 1500 miles of Persian Gulf coastline. These are our waters & we will protect them.”

Politics watchers are keen to see whether Johnson continues Britain’s effort to salvage the 2015 deal designed to discourage Iran from developing nuclear weapons, or whether he bends to U.S. pressure to impose sanctions on Iran.

Boris is the sort of politician who will understand that there is no point going to war with another country if you don’t have a country in the first place. Nobody cares if Iran nukes Israel, but everybody cares one way or another, whether Real Briton or globalist, about whether or not Great Britain stays British.

Keeping Great Britain British is Boris Johnson’s number one task.

XYZ Live #76 – Waleed Aly Gaslights Australia on Adam Goodes

Bradley from the Australian Protectionist Party joined us last night as we discussed the week of virtue signalling on aboriginal issues. Topics discussed:

  • The Adam Goodes documentary, “The Final Quarter”.
  • Waleed Aly’s epic gaslight in comparing Donald Trump and Adam Goodes.
  • Whether or not aborigines should have their own independent state or whether we should work to build a nation comprising real Australians and aborigines.
  • Building a casino and Olympic-sized swimming pool on Ayers Rock.


XYZ Live starts at 9:15ish AEST every Monday evening. Find us at Matty Rose Live.

Nobody cares if Iran nukes Israel

WARNING: This article contains graphic content.

I am supposed to care that Iran might get a nuclear bomb. Tensions had been rising in the region since Donald Trump rightly abandoned Barack Obama’s shoddy nuclear deal. The twitter exchanges were pretty epic, the US and Iran have been knocking each other’s drones out of the sky, there were these weird explosions on two ships and Britain detained an Iranian tanker. Oh, and the US came within minutes of launching a serious military strike.

As a student of history, I know escalation when I see it, and I know it can go either one way or another.

But as a student of history I also understand that our countries have changed to be almost unrecognisable from those that fought two world wars in the 20th century, that stepped back several times from the nuclear precipice with the Soviets, and even from those that went to war with Iraq twice.

Do I need to spell it out?

Let’s take Great Britain for example. We are told that Iran is a country which limits the freedom of its citizens, restricts the freedom of the press, and forces its women to walk around in potato sacks.

How is that..

..any different..

..to Britain?

So who cares if Iran has nukes?

How about the US? “Death to America” is supposedly the motto of the Iranians. They do say it a bit. That’s not fake news. But what would happen if Iran got a nuclear bomb, an ICMB or dozen, and was crazy enough to not worry about this little thing called Mutually Assured Destruction and fling several at the US? Obviously, Iran would target America’s major cities.

But have you seen America’s election map?

And America’s racial diversity map?

Fears of nuclear radiation and a so-called “nuclear winter” were massively exaggerated during the Cold War by KGB infiltrators in Western academia and governments in order to undermine the West’s nuclear deterrent, and conveniently amplified by communist shills in Hollywood. It’s really not that big a deal.

Getting nuked by Iran would return America to a white, Republican voting majority. Ditto for Australia. #NukeMelbourne.

So who cares if Iran has nukes?

What about Iran’s neighbours?

Shitholes. Every last one of them.

What about terrorism? Iran is supposed to be a major sponsor of terrorism. It’s just that..


we kinda already have that problem.

Terrorism pretty much only exists in countries which have Muslim populations. Even the so-called “far-right” terrorism in formerly European countries only exists as a self defensive reaction against Islamic terrorism. We could end Islamic terror tomorrow by removing every single Muslim from Western countries. It’s really not that big a deal.

So who cares if Iran has nukes?

What about oil? Aren’t we supposed to be moving away from fossil fuels? America became self sufficient since it ramped up production. Nuclear power remains vastly under-utilised, thanks to those afore-mentioned commies, and Elon Musk is bound to get around to rebuilding Nicolai Tesla’s free energy building sooner or later. The “no blood for oil” lefties are the drooling idiots of geopolitics.

So who cares if Iran has nukes?

There is one reason, and one reason alone, why we are supposed to care, and the neocons who have infiltrated US politics have literally said it as clearly as possible:

From ABC News:

Vice President Mike Pence accused Iran of advocating for another Holocaust on Saturday as he finished up a European tour in which he threatened tougher U.S. sanctions against the country, and asked for other countries to follow America’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.

“The Iranian regime openly advocates another Holocaust and it seeks the means to achieve it,” Pence said while speaking at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday.

Israel. The holocaust. That’s literally it. That’s all they’ve got.

Never mind that Israel has its own nuclear arsenal and a second strike capability via its submarine fleet. Never mind that a sprawling diaspora means that destroying Israel would not destroy the Jewish people. Never mind that Israel is responsible for the USS Liberty and 9/11 false flags and the abuse of white children via its setting up of the Jeffrey Epstein blackmail operation.

And never mind that two world wars and the devastation of communism led to the slaughter of over a hundred million Europeans during the 20th century. The slogan “never again” elevates the lives of several million Jews above 100 million Europeans and requires Europeans to sacrifice their own lives again and again and again for Israel.

I say never, ever, again.

I don’t care if Iran has nuclear weapons, and I reckon a lot of my fellow countrymen and my brothers in other European countries don’t give a pig’s arse either. I don’t care about bringing peace, stability or democracy to the Middle East, and I reckon Israel can look after itself.

I care about the future of my people, the integrity of my nation, and the future of my European brothers. I don’t care about the governments of European countries that continue to import foreigners at levels that will replace European peoples, and if the major European centres of government power were lost (which are pretty much all turning into cosmopolitan shitholes anyway) I do not see how that that could lead to anything other than a rebirth of European vitality.

I will have more to say in the near future on how this affects Australia specifically, but the point is this:

In pursuing so-called “diversity” for political and economic reasons, Western governments made geopolitics essentially meaningless. “America”, “Great Britain” “Europe” and “Australia” do not mean what they used to mean. The next war that Real Americans, Real Britons, Real Europeans and real Australians fight isn’t going to be for Israel. It will be for the future of our own countries.

Booing Adam Goodes is not racist, but it has everything to do with race

In June we noted that the AFL was planning a 1984-style rewrite of history when it apologised to Adam Goodes for supposedly not doing enough to stop crowds from booing him during the final years of his career, and alleging that this booing was racist.

This narrative belies the fact that the AFL actually went into full nanny corporation mode in an attempt to stop the boos, the fact that Adam Goodes was the only aboriginal player to get booed, the fact that crowds booed Goodes for his arrogant behaviour, insulting public statements and foul play, and the fact that crowds only started booing Goodes after he injected himself into identity politics debates in Australia.

The apology was issued ahead of a documentary due for release which would assist in this historical revisionism, and was used as a pretext for the introduction of so-called “Behavioural Awareness Officers”. While the latter was widely ridiculed, the documentary aired this week on Channel 10, leading to insistence from conservatives that the booing was not racist, and predictable insistence from the left that it was, and calls for the heads of those who publicly criticised Goodes.

While admirable, the arguments of conservatives that the booing was not racist is futile for two reasons.

Firstly, The AFL have used the standard leftist tactic of insisting that the cultural battle is already over. Just look at what Tanya Hosch, who holds the Orwellian title of “General Manager of Inclusion” at the AFL, has to say about the matter.

From the Australian:

AFL general Manager of Inclusion Tanya Hosch last night told Network 10’s The project that the AFL had erred by taking too long to work out how to respond to the booing directed at Goodes.

“I think taking too much time to determine how to respond,” she said.

“I feel like the AFL probably got stuck where a lot of Australia got stuck which was having a conversation and getting bogged down into a debate about whether the booing was racist or not rather than addressing something that was clearly racially motivated.”

As far as the AFL is concerned, the debate is over, the booing was racist, we have always been at war with Eastasia. SJW’s, otherwise known as anti-white communists, have full spectrum dominance of the public and private sector. The left can afford to ignore us because they know we are not going to make them pay for it.

The second reason conservative insistence that booing Adam Goodes was not “racist” is futile is that in doing so we accept the left’s frame of reference. The term “racism” is an anti-white racial slur invented by Jewish communists used to undermine the cohesion of formerly homogenous white nations, and to mask the unmitigated horrors committed by socialists during the 20th century.

In focusing solely on making the case no matter how forthrightly that booing Adam Goodes was not “racist”, the left still wins. White Australians continue to insist that our actions are colourblind and we continue to try as hard as we can to treat everybody equally on the basis of race. Meanwhile, non-whites continue to practice in-group preference; more institutions are founded to advocate for non-white interests, more institutions and corporations explicitly allow favourable treatment to non-whites with relation to hiring and promotion, and the in-group preference practiced both formally and informally by non-white communities is normalised.

In short, non-whites engage in behaviour which if practiced by whites would be called “racist”, while whites fastidiously avoid engaging in behaviour that could even come close to being perceived as in-group preference in order to avoid the life ending charge of “racism”.

In football it is the equivalent of one side whose players always attempt to pass to each other competing against a side whose players pass to any player regardless of what guernsey they wear. It would lead to a thrashing.

As so in the grand game of race.

White people have been brainwashed out of engaging in the perfectly normal behaviour of preferring to live and work with those of our extended British and European family. The enforcement of cultural norms via social ostracism, for example by booing a football player who tells Real Australians that Australia is not their land, is how a people defend themselves and perpetuate themselves and their culture. In labelling this behaviour as “racism”, parasites remove the immune system of a nation.

It is a state of affairs which if continued unabated will lead to whites becoming a minority in their own homelands, our increased marginalisation and our eventual replacement. Thus the term “racism” is actually a tool of white genocide.

We could win this small cultural battle and still lose the Culture War, which ultimately is a Racial Holy War against white people, because we are not treating it as such or even acknowledging that the the enemy fighting it exists.

Importantly, it was Goodes who made race an issue. White Australians were rightly incensed that he would condescendingly state “just remember whose land you’re on” given that white Australians had spent decades bending over backwards to atone for what we have been brainwashed into thinking are the sins of our white Australian forefathers.

Whether it is a referendum, native title, the national apology, or another referendum and change to the Australian Constitution, Aussies are realising that there is always something symbolic we have to do in order to atone for invented past sins, and we absolutely cannot move on until we have changed the law or said sorry for something, yet once this is done there will always be something else we are made to feel guilty for.

This is ultimately why we booed Adam Goodes. It wasn’t racist, but it had everything to do with race.

We white, Anglo-Celtic and European Australians are sick of being told we are evil, our country is evil, those who came before us are evil and that we have to keep giving hand over fist to make up for it.

This is why the rebuttals from the civic nationalist establishment are welcome but inadequate. We have to become immune to the charge of “racism” and relearn the so-called “racist” behavioural patterns we have been deliberately brainwashed to forget. If we are going to win, we must accept that the Culture War is a Racial Holy War and act accordingly.

The Uncuckables Ep.18: Go Back Home

Tim Wilms from the Unshackled and The XYZ’s David Hiscox were over the ebola scare, and were joined by James Fox Higgins from the Rational Rise. Topics discussed:

  • Donald Trump’s “racist” tweets trigger the Democrats’ first serious attempt to impeach him.
  • Antifa terrorist attack in Tecoma, Washington.
  • Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest, pizzagate and Israel.
  • Court time for Tommy Robinson, Avi Yemini, Blair Cottrell and Neil Erikson.
  • Pauline Hanson and Ayers Rock.


The Uncuckables livestreams between 8:30 and 10:00 pm AEST every Thursday evening. Find us at YouTube and join the chaos that is the live chat:


Why is there no disabled access to the top of Ayers Rock?

Ayers Rock is a big clump of rock in the middle of the Australian desert that is so big, it looks like a skin cancer from outer space.

It has no spiritual significance whatsoever, but some people who still cling to their spears and religion have managed to amass enough political clout to convince bureaucrats in the Socialist Democratic Republic of Australia to stop more enlightened people from climbing the rock to see what it looks like from the top.

Soft-nationalist Pauline Hanson has appeared on the idiot box (seriously, only boomers watch that thing any more) to make the case that normal people, who understand that the idea that a giant snake made all the different geological formations in the Australian bush sounds like a fairy tale, should be allowed to climb the rock. (Again seriously, everybody knows the universe came into existence entirely by chance 13 billion years ago. Scientists have proved this and stuff. Isn’t it time we moved on past our religious crutch?)

This led to a hilarious piece in nEwS.cOm that complained that an all-white panel debated the issue of climbing Ayers Rock, then claimed that social media erupted in outrage. The examples given of social media outrage appeared to lack the same so-called “diversity” the article was accusing the Today show of lacking.

From News.com:

One Nation’s Pauline Hanson and radio host Steve Price appeared on Today this morning to argue why the sacred rock should stay open to climbers.

But the breakfast show’s choice of having Price and Ms Hanson, both caucasian Australians, debate the topic alongside Today host Deb Knight, also a caucasian Australian, has been lashed on social media.

Taking to Twitter, dozens of Australians described the debate as “racist” and “unbalanced”.

So white lol.

Anyway, Pauline made a really good point:

Every now and then, people get hurt or even have heart attacks and die when climbing Ayers Rock. This is understandable. Look at the thing, it is steep as:

A photo which went viral on social media (not fake viral like news.com likes to claim about people bagging out Pauline Hanson) of tourists determined to beat the impending closure of the Ayers Rock climb. Daily numbers of people making the trek have increased threefold in recent months.

People have also videoed the climb, and it looks like hard work. They even give you a chain to help you pull yourself up:

A deeply superstitious explanation has been given for why Ayers Rock should be closed to climbers on so-called “cultural” grounds:

Today reporter Brooke Boney, a Gamilaroi Gomeroi woman, was later asked her opinion on the Uluru closure after the original segment had aired.

“This isn’t indigenous people having some sort of say over what happened on their lands, their sacred sites,” Boney said at the end of the breakfast program.

The thing about (Uluru) is it is so sacred to them every time someone gets injured or hurt or has to be airlifted out … it hurts them and they say that the ancestors mourn the loss of those people. They are not doing it to be nasty or protective of themselves, they are doing it to protect others.”

So, there is a really simple, inclusive and obvious solution to all of this, one that should be a win-win for all parties:

Build a giant escalator.

Such an escalator would be slightly shorter and slightly less steep than the ones that take commuters to the underground terminals at Parliament Station in Melbourne, and it would provide the opportunity to less able-privileged tourists to enjoy the changing views as they travel up the rock.

Other options to be considered:

  • Drilling in fixed bins, both for rubbish and recycling, into the rock at regular intervals to discourage littering.
  • Drilling a tunnel and a giant elevator so that people can reach the top by going inside the rock.
  • Construct a giant ramp so that people can drive their SUV’s and camper vans to the top.
  • Construct a helipad at the top to reduce the ecological footprint of people climbing all the way up the rock, and to assist airlifts in the rare cases that people still do need medical assistance.
  • Put a cafe next to the helipad. And a pub.

Because it’s the current year.

The XYZ is eager to take further suggestions as to how Ayers Rock can be developed to achieve its full potential in a manner that is inclusive and respects the beliefs and wishes of all Australians, while expanding access in order to move on from the shameful ableist policies of the past. Extra points for artist’s impressions of what a giant ramp would look like.

It’s your XYZ.

Unfortunately, Donald Trump is not a “racist”

Donald Trump is on a roll. A clever bit of bullying forced Mexico to effectively bypass the US deep state and not so deep state obstruction to his mandate to close the border. He prevented World War 3. Far more importantly, he has got the ball rolling in defending our rights to be racist, homophobic, Islamophobic, deplorable, you name it on the internet.

Donald Trump is the President of the United States but he is not the most powerful man in the United States. He is one guy fighting against an entire system which has been hijacked in order to suppress the liberty of the people, and ultimately replace the people it was originally designed to protect.

What can I say, I want to believe.

It is in this context that we are presented with a headline that appears almost too good to be true:

From the Australian:

Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi has accused Donald Trump of xenophobia and trying to create a white America after he called on four minority liberal congresswomen to go back to where they came from.

The US President’s comments came as immigration authorities launched small-scale operations to arrest undocumented families in a start to Mr Trump’s plan to ­deport thousands of immigrants.

Mr Trump’s Twitter attack had the effect of uniting a Democratic Party that has been increasingly divided by a fallout between its centrist House of Representatives Speaker Ms Pelosi and the four freshmen liberal congresswomen.

The President said the “Progressive Democratic Congresswomen” should go back to their countries of origin and fix them up first before they lectured on how the US should be run…

Mr Trump was referring to the four new congresswomen of ­colour, Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortex, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley.

So, is the God Emperor channelling his inner Aussie bogan by telling foreign invaders “f– off we’re full”?

Here is the series of tweets:

The operative phrase here is “come back”:

“Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.Then come back and show us how..”

Donald Trump is not defending the progeny of heritage Americans by telling foreign invaders to “go back where they came from” and never come back. This is not an open embrace of ethnic nationalism, but a statement of the civic nationalist idea that anybody can come to the West from anywhere on the planet and become good citizens as long as they share our values.

This gang of four are indeed non-white but Trump is not highlighting their race, he is highlighting that their home countries do not allow their countrymen the freedoms that America provides, and they are poorer for it.

It is very simple:

Love it or leave it = civic nationalism = not “racist”
F— off we’re full = ethnic nationalism = waaaaacist

You’d never know this, going by what Nancy Pelosi said:

Ms Pelosi put aside her frustration with The Squad and ­defended them against the President’s attack. “When Donald Trump tells four American congresswomen to go back to their countries, he reaffirms his plan to “Make America Great Again” has always been about making America white again,” she tweeted.

Just as with Jeff Kennett’s recent moment of clarity when he pointed out that the AFL’s so-called “Behavioural Awareness Officers” didn’t look like they are from here and thus may not know our game, SJW’s always jump on anyone who utters anything even slightly civic nationalist in order to prevent the Overton Window shifting to race realism.

The irony is that it is the SJW’s who are truly obsessed with race. Let’s examine one of the opening statements from the article:

Mr Trump’s Twitter attack had the effect of uniting a Democratic Party that has been increasingly divided by a fallout between its centrist House of Representatives Speaker Ms Pelosi and the four freshmen liberal congresswomen.

It is true that the gang of four represent the hard left of the hard left and that there is an ideological civil war going on inside the US Democrat Party, but this ideological war is primarily centred around intersectionality, ie, race.

There is a race war going on inside the Democratic Party.

The old white and Jewish Democrat establishment is being replaced by people of more so-called “diverse” backgrounds who are prepared to use the old left’s identity politics against them. Thus the left is consumed by its own anti-white hatred and the Democratic Party is being demographically replaced, just as its own policies are demographically replacing Americans.

Naturally, they project this hatred onto Donald Trump. Thus this becomes an example of how the anti-white political-media complex lies to us.

We don’t do gay: Nivea tells SJW advertiser to shove it

So you invest millions of dollars into a really good product that millions of your customers want. You specialise in making things, not selling things, so you hire some people who specialise in selling things. These people tell you that if you don’t agree to sell your product the way they want you to, they will tell everybody else that you are bad and organise an international boycott of your company.

In a sane world this would be called extortion.

Not so in clownworld in the current year.

From News.com:

Nivea has been spectacularly dumped by its own advertising agency and accused of homophobia after a company executive allegedly rejected an ad pitch saying, “We don’t do gay”.

The offensive remarks (sic) have prompted a boycott movement, with angry consumers posting videos and photos of themselves binning their Nivea products in an attempt to “cancel” the skincare brand.

Boycotting efforts began after the contents of a phone call, between Nivea executives and creatives from the New York-based ad agency, Foote, Cone & Belding (FCB), were leaked.

Nivea has been a client of FCB for 100 years, and spends more than $400 million on advertising annually.

This is why people can’t give their money away fast enough to Israel Folau, and why the globohomo establishment are dead wrong when they argue that Folau’s case is simply about breach of contract rather than free speech. Employees are forced to sign contracts compelling them to keep their opinions on SJW identity politics to themselves while the companies they work for relentlessly push an SJW identity politics agenda. In turn, companies are forced to push this SJW identity politics agenda by SJW extortion.

This is literally Exhibit A in how SJW’s extort companies into pushing their agenda. If we are going to stop the SJW identity politics agenda, companies are going to have to be prepared to take the hit when they say no to these freaks.

During the conference call, an FCB representative reportedly pitched a commercial in which two men would be filmed touching hands.

The pitch was flatly rejected, with an executive from the beauty brand allegedly saying: “We don’t do gay at Nivea.”

Among those looped in on the conference call was a gay advertising executive who had been behind the pitch.

Normies don’t push the globohomo agenda. Normal heterosexual people are not screaming out for mundane products to be advertised to us in commercials featuring homosexuality. We just want milk that tastes like real milk. Not identity politics. That is what “We don’t do gay at Nivea” means. It means stop doing this:


Naturally, this broke Twitter:

The company executive’s remarks have caused a social media frenzy, as people around the world film and photograph themselves dumping their Nivea products in the bin.

Many have moved to permanently cancel the brand after years of advertising faux pas and subsequent public apologies from the company.

Check out the carry on in this vid but:

You’re doing it wrong, “Venus”. Shut up, and don’t put your hands in after you idiot:


Posted by David Hiscox on Tuesday, 15 January 2019

Oh by the way:

Go woke, go broke. Focus on creating a good product and sell it for more than it costs to make, advertise and distribute, go well. Hell I’m just gonna but their stuff just cos.

News.com’s own poll bears this out:


Here is Nivea’s response:

A Nivea spokesman responded to FCB’s move to dump the brand as a client, telling advertising news outlet Campaign US it was the “right time for a new beginning” in the company’s creative work.

“We understand that emotions and news interest are intensified when a longtime business relationship comes to an end,” the spokesman said.

We believe the expression is….burn…..

Nivea actually have a history of being based:

This isn’t the first time the skincare company has been criticised for its ill-advised campaign decisions.

In 2017, Nivea was forced to ditch an ad campaign for its Invisible For Black & White women’s deodorant after the public labelled it “racially insensitive”.

The advertisement, which ran in the Middle East, featured a woman with long, dark hair, wearing white and staring out of a window in a brightly lit room.

But it was the slogan accompanying the photo that caused the controversy.

“White is purity,” the ad read.

In a Facebook post beside the newly launched advertisement, Nivea wrote: “Keep it clean, keep it bright. Don’t let anything ruin it.”

White is indeed purity. Don’t let anyone ever tell you otherwise. Campaigns stretching back a decade have got them in trouble.



The company has offered a lukewarm apology but I reckon they have some hardcore nationalists at the top. Unlike Officeworks, I think we can allow Nivea in the ethnostate.

The Uncuckables: Ep. 17 How Bad is Antifa?

Last night David Hiscox from The XYZ, Tim Wilms from the Unshackled and Australian Meditations summarised the week in Australian politics.  Topics included:

  • Tax cuts.
  • Christopher Pyne and Julie Bishop getting jobs for the boys and girls.
  • Tim Wilson swears on Milton Friedman.
  • Israel Folau, and the possibility of setting up a fighting fund for future Culture War court cases.

We took apart a propaganda piece by Vox which attempted to appear even-handed with regard to the Portland Antifa Riot, but was really just cover for Antifa violence and an attempt to regain control of the narrative given that mainstream attention has finally focused on Antifa’s terrorism.

Towards the end of the stream (1:24:00) Australian Meditations read out an astounding poem by Henry Lawson.


Join us every Thursday evening at 8:30 pm AEST.  You will find us at The Uncuckables.