The Creep of Paedonormativity, or; Where Are Their Fathers?

I’ve written a few times about Paedovorism (that’s the dialectically accurate nomenclature for what most people call paedophilia), a term that I defined in my article Should convicted “paedovores” be burnt alive? or, See; We can make New Words too! in which I also made a rational case for execution by public burning for those convicted of sexual predation and molestation of children. It’s not that I would take pleasure in seeing a man burnt alive, it would probably make me sick to the stomach, but not as sick as the global trafficking of children and the now commonplace normalisation of paedovorism in the West makes me. It’s also a case I make for most utilitarian reasons; in order to effectively reverse the damage done to our sexual norms in the now Cosmopolitan, do-what-you-feel, anything goes Western world, we must reinstate harsh, even brutal punishments for those who do irreversible damage to the innocent and to the commons.

I also commented on this important topic in my article Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, in which I pointed out that not only was Israel Folau right to say what he said on social media, leading to his sacking, but that his trial by media is all a distraction from the far more important point: we are living in the late decadent stage of a crumbling Western Empire. Much like the fallen cities of Sodom, Gomorrah, and Rome, we are facing a degenerated culture which no longer conceals sexual perversion and the prostitution of women and trafficking of children for the pleasure of the Godless, but now, in fact, promotes it.

This story from @PinkNews on twitter did the rounds today, with many conservatives expressing their shock and disgust at the proud promotion of a homosexual, prostitution-like relationship between this young man Kayleb Alexander, and his “Daddy”, Mark. Some folks might say, “who cares? They’re both grown men!”

But read on.


The moment Mark realised that, if this gamble of public paedo-pride for Google dollars backfires, he’s going to jail.

If you haven’t yet done the maths, Kayleb is stating on public record that he began this sexual, money-based relationship with Mark at the age of sixteen.

People are already calling PinkNews to task for promoting it, but given that it is content from Kayleb’s own YouTube channel, there are certainly bigger fish to fry.

My question is this: Where is Kayleb’s real Daddy? Why was he not protected at that young age from the predatory attention of Mark? These problems we’re seeing in the West today are, I believe, the unavoidable result of a culture and set of government Welfare policies which have incentivised and celebrated women raising children on their own. Why would a woman need to worry about carefully selecting a partner for his virtue, strength of character, and willingness to stay the course in marriage and co-parenting when the government will simply pay her because she got knocked up? A whole generation of young boys and girls have become the hobby projects of women who have no man. Conversely, men are not being raised by fathers who instil within them a sense of responsibility and a desire to make a life with a woman, and raise children with care, and high investment. There are a lot of lost boys as a result, and without a paternal guide, they act like their mothers (loose sexual morals and all), and they look for new “Daddy’s”.

The collapse of the West is the result of the weakening of men, and the only solution is the multi-generational strengthening of men once more. Our generation’s fathers may have abandoned us, but we are seeing a restoration of strong moral convictions in Generation Z (the Zoomers), and when those kids grow up, they will undoubtedly change the world and steer it back towards sanity.

Take this example recently posted on Reddit, and note the weakness and indoctrination of the mother, the appropriate (though weakly enacted) intuition of the father, and the strength of the child in spite of her flailing Millennial parents, when trying to decide whether or not the debauched and sinful lifestyle of her Aunt is tolerable or appropriate.

Despite their parents’ failure to judge, Gen Z is growing up in the Trumpian age of Fake News awareness, exodus from mainstream media, and instant access to unauthorised alternative narratives, and these kids aren’t buying what the Millennials are selling.

Despite this, they are still kids, and they don’t run the show yet. So, under the dismally disastrous watch of the grownup Millennials, child prostitution is now being proudly flaunted on Google, to the applause of Kayleb’s 144,000 subscribers, and with his millions upon millions of views which are making both he and his “Daddy” a lot of money… from Google and their advertising partners.

This is the same Google corporation who have been exposed less than 24 hours ago by Project Veritas for rigging their algorithms to suppress conservative website search results, and to alter their image search results to deliberately distort the predominance of, say, a bunch of men in the image results for the search “CEO” (even if it accurately represents the male to female ratio in reality) in order to “help society reach a more fair and equitable state via product intervention“.

Let me connect the dots for you: Google are fine with hosting and supporting an entire YouTube channel dedicated to the promotion of the shallow, financially-driven, intergenerational child prostitution of a 16-year-old boy by a 49-year-old man, but don’t you dare expect them to publish or allow through their right-wing dragnet your opinions if they describe reality in a way that Google arbitrarily deems “unhelpful” to their Utopian vision of fairness and equity – whatever the hell that means.

It certainly raises the question: If homosexuality is just a normal and constant part of human society, that 1-2% of people who are just born that way, wired differently, and love is simply love, and there’s no cause for alarm about it, then why was it illegal, shunned, and even violently discouraged in the West in the past, and why is still that way in the Islamic world? Is it merely religious bigotry and evil? Or did our predecessors know their history a little better than us, and fear the outcome if one step was taken in the cultural norms towards sexual liberalism of that kind.

You don’t have to believe in God to begin to understand why Sodom and Gomorrah are on historical record for falling into oblivion. Whether the fire came directly from the hand of God, or from the failure of town planning, waste management, and taming of the sex-crazed syphilitic masses (as we are seeing today in Democrat-run US cities like San Francisco, Baltimore and Detroit), there seems to be a similar troubling cycle repeating in the West today. Sexual liberalism, the abandonment of conservative, Christian principles of behaviour, the overt (and often city-funded) expression of pride for lust, and the demands of tiny minorities with abnormal sexual predilections for absolute and unequivocal recognition, if not outright glorification, by EVERYONE (or else they’ll slander, sue, or otherwise destroy your business and career) have become the focal point of social discord today. They have also become the social precedent for the emerging normalisation of paedovorism, which is a real shame for your run-of-the-mill gay couples, who just want to live together in peace, but are going to have a very hard time doing that if the social pendulum swings back too hard in the future.

Do you think I’m exaggerating about the vitriolic and destructive streak that the LGBTQI+ activists are no longer trying to conceal?

We all remember the “Gay Wedding Cake” story from the USA around the last Presidential election. The globohomo activists dragged a couple of Christian bakers through hell, to prove a point (and probably to try and win damages in court which would ultimately pay for their big, fat, gay wedding). More recently, many of us have heard all about fake trans activist, paedo-predator, and professional grifter Jonathan Yaniv (who prefers to go by ‘Jessica’ as of recently, despite the “dead-name” of Jonathan still being his legal name), and his campaign to get lots and lots of money from poor unsuspecting beauticians who refused to wax his very male balls when he falsely represented himself as a woman to their places of ladies-only beauty services.

A lesser publicised, but much more close-to-home example of the parasitic and all-consuming appetite of globohomo activism came last year with the closing down of White Magazine, a beautiful publication dedicated to the celebration and uplifting of the lifelong commitment made between man and woman in holy matrimony. The moment gay marriage became legally recognised in Australia, the globohomo activists bombarded the publishers of White Magazine with demands that they begin to cover gay marriages in their highly curated and beautifully edited pages. They very sensibly said we hear you, and we’re not sure if we’re going to do that yet, or words to that effect, and that was enough for a vicious and hateful campaign to begin, ultimately leading the couple who ran this magazine to quit the business, for fear of their mental health being further damaged through stress from the relentless attacks, and of escalation of the threats and hatred they were receiving, fast and furious.

I happen to have met the couple at a day of Christian fellowship, and they are very close of friends of one of my best friends, and I can assure you that these are possibly two of the least hateful or judgemental people you will ever meet. They simply wanted to make a magazine for heterosexual couples getting married, and infuse a secular publication celebrating marriage with their Christian values of integrity, trust, love, commitment, and recognition of the balancing strengths of masculine and feminine. They never expressed disgust, disdain, or any judgement against gay marriage, they simply wanted to keep focusing on what they were already doing with great success. But the globohomo agenda is referred to as such, because it is exactly that: you must bow down to the cult of total sexual “liberation”, or we are coming for you.

All through this process of engineered social “progress”, we repeatedly hear the words “Human Rights” assigned to the enforcement (by law, media, or mob rule) of compliance with the current year zeitgeist. Never mind your human right to mind your own business, or to opt out of dealing with people you find distasteful, or who are not your target market; globohomo will mind your business for you, to make sure you’re up to date with attitudes deemed properly modern, and make you serve those to whom you object. How enlightened!

We have been assured repeatedly over the last thirty or so years that the universal acceptance and “equalisation” of homosexuality in the West is merely a civil rights issue, akin to the fight for black equality in the United States, and that changing our laws to decriminalise sodomy and later legally recognise gay marriage, was not in any way, shape, or form, a slippery slope. It’s getting harder and harder to buy it anymore. It seems to be more like a LANDSLIDE.

It’s an ideological war against the Christian foundations of Western Civilisation, and it’s done with incredible patience, and multi-generational commitment. The sequence I perceive goes like this: Decriminalise > Normalise > Legalise > Equalise > Glorify > Magnify > Replicate > Enforce.

The sequence didn’t occur in the same order, at the same time, in all places of the West, so you’ll forgive my generalised narrative to illustrate the point of the slow, progressive march of globohomo.


Sodomy used to be a criminal offence, seen as an affront to God and an abomination against the nature of mankind (to use Biblical terminology). Successful propaganda campaigning since the late 19th century saw this gradually change to sodomy becoming almost universally decriminalised. At this point, we in the West took the very modern attitude of “hey, what you do in your bedroom is none of my business,” and everyone was fairly happy to accept that truce, except perhaps the oldest generation of traditionalist Christians (who are now all dead).


Then, through the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 70s, with the free love movement, and the music of John Lennon, Jefferson Aeroplane, The Doors, David Bowie, and Lou Reed (among others) and the later sexually-charged atmosphere of the Disco generation, the Boomers established themselves for the next few decades as the revolutionaries who lovingly embraced, promoted, and endorsed sexual promiscuity of just about all forms. Polygamy, prostitution, pornography, and kink were no longer shameful or secretive deeds, and so homosexuality was now (at least by contrast) totally normal!


The Millennial generation, far more gullible and less cynical than Generation X (who mostly wanted to get away from their Boomer parents and focus on making money) have been the agitators and ultimate victors in the quest for “equality”, and by decree of our federal governments, gay marriage is fully legally recognised in all of the United States, Canada, Australia, and Britain (the Anglosphere), and much of Europe. Surely we’re done now?


Nope. That’s not far enough. Now we need corporate representation of the homosexual lifestyle in all our advertising and publications to which we and our children are exposed every day. Have you noticed just how many media companies and advertising agencies are convincing their clients to splash gay love into just about everything? Notice how every TV franchise has a gay character now, if not a host of them? Notice how trans people are starting to show up everywhere too, and there is a groundswell of demand for trans representation in all things? As my friend David Hiscock from the XYZ puts it; 1% of the demographic, 100% of the advertising budget. Why? I mean… gays are maybe 2% of the population at most, and trans people are far fewer than that – though it does seem the numbers are increasing. How peculiar. It’s almost as though all this public display and loud, vocal normalisation of homosexuality is making more gay and trans people… but that can’t be right, because they were born that way, weren’t they? (We’re still waiting for the identification of a gay or trans gene).


This is probably the stage we’re at now in the creep of globohomo. “Pride month” is a big deal, and the name says it all. They are proud of the fact that they have abnormal sexual desires which cannot bear fruit. Trans kids and drag kids are being paraded on mainstream television shows to celebrate and glorify our progress away from stigmatised sexuality. Public libraries in all Western countries are booking transvestite “storytellers” to propagandise our children. Sweden, Holland, Canada, and even our own state of Victoria are introducing “educational” programs that teach primary school children about oral sex, anal sex, and how to experiment until they find out which flavour of kink they should construct their still-forming identities around. They have armies of academics now whose entire mandate is to rationalise and rewrite history to abolish the idea of what is “normal” and to remove traditional (i.e. true) definitions of gender from the English lexicon. But the biological reality cannot be pretended away: every single human being on Earth has two biological parents, one man, one woman. We can diddle with the process in all kinds of newfangled ways, but at this stage without the unique genetic material of one man and one woman, baby-making is bust. This is what I mean when I say “normal” or “natural” when it comes to sex. Sex is for procreation, despite our hyper-focus on its utility as a source of entertainment and pleasure, and if we don’t make babies, our civilisation will completely collapse under the weight of just about any other culture who do make babies. Starts to sketch an outline of the reasoning behind the previous intolerance for homosexuality, at least from a social utilitarianism viewpoint, doesn’t it?


This is where we’re headed next. Yaniv is a great example of this. The media eat up any story that points to “bigotry”, “hatred”, “homophobia”, “transphobia”, or any of the other made-up terms they use to declare all opposition to globohomo as evil. Surely if any such activists read this article, they’ll lump me into one of those categories. Fortunately, I don’t care. I don’t answer to globohomo, or any of Satan’s legions. I answer to Jesus Christ, and he was very clear about what awaits those who lead little ones to stumble into sin.


The globohomo movement will not be satisfied with winning over some cities and regions in the West. It wants the whole kit-and-caboodle, and woe betide any states, municipalities, churches, or families who don’t get in line! Systematically, prominent representatives of each segment of globohomo-resistant society will be attacked, following the above-listed programme, until everyone everywhere bows down and declares their allegiance to the cult.


Being the end of the sequence, this stage will seem the most far-fetched scenario, but it’s worth considering, just in case it is in the realm of possibility. After all, most of the things they said “would never happen” are happening, thanks to this landslide effect. In the enforcement stage, it will be compulsory to engage in homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, and probably paedovorism, if not outright child sacrifice (the literal killing and eating of children, as is currently practised only in elite occult circles). It won’t be in the name of Moloch like it once was, but it will still serve the Evil One who was lurking behind all of the demonic idols of old. By this stage, a huge portion of the ordinary, apolitical homosexual community will be objecting as well, but they will be deemed to suffer internalised globohomophobia, or some other such Newspeak, and they will be re-educated, or culled. The rest of us who refuse to participate will likely be imprisoned or killed, but it won’t happen much because all children will be property of the Globohomo One-World State, and all children will be thoroughly indoctrinated and abused from birth to put them in the appropriate state of trauma needed for total slavery.

Sodom, according to the Bible, had most certainly reached this final stage of globohomo advancement:

Genesis 19

1 The two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and bowed himself with his face to the earth 2 and said, “My lords, please turn aside to your servant’s house and spend the night and wash your feet. Then you may rise up early and go on your way.” They said, “No; we will spend the night in the town square.” 3 But he pressed them strongly; so they turned aside to him and entered his house. And he made them a feast and baked unleavened bread, and they ate.

4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house. 5 And they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.” 6 Lot went out to the men at the entrance, shut the door after him, 7and said, “I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly. 8 Behold, I have two daughters who have not known any man. Let me bring them out to you, and do to them as you please. Only do nothing to these men, for they have come under the shelter of my roof.” 9 But they said, “Stand back!” And they said, “This fellow came to sojourn, and he has become the judge! Now we will deal worse with you than with them.” Then they pressed hard against the man Lot, and drew near to break the door down. 10 But the men reached out their hands and brought Lot into the house with them and shut the door. 11 And they struck with blindness the men who were at the entrance of the house, both small and great, so that they wore themselves out groping for the door.

Regarding the shameful offering of his daughters as sacrifice to the sex-crazed mob, I can only imagine Lot’s terror at the situation: a city-sized mob was surrounding his house, demanding the Angels be sent out to be gang-raped, and those same Angels were inside, probably looking quite peeved, and Lot rightly feared the destruction of everyone should this evil be allowed to continue. Were it me, and my daughters at stake, I’d’ve revved up the chainsaw and strapped on the 12-gauge bandolier, ready to mow down as many of the zombies as possible, but that option wasn’t likely available to Lot in the year 1897 B.C.

Lot was right to fear total destruction, for the purpose of the Angel’s visit was to warn him and rescue him from this fallen city, which I have no doubt was run by Democrats.

12 Then the men said to Lot, “Have you anyone else here? Sons-in-law, sons, daughters, or anyone you have in the city, bring them out of the place. 13 For we are about to destroy this place, because the outcry against its people has become great before the LORD, and the LORD has sent us to destroy it.” 14 So Lot went out and said to his sons-in-law, who were to marry his daughters, “Up! Get out of this place, for the LORD is about to destroy the city.” But he seemed to his sons-in-law to be jesting.

15 As morning dawned, the angels urged Lot, saying, “Up! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, lest you be swept away in the punishment of the city.” 16 But he lingered. So the men seized him and his wife and his two daughters by the hand, the LORD being merciful to him, and they brought him out and set him outside the city. 17 And as they brought them out, one said, “Escape for your life. Do not look back or stop anywhere in the valley. Escape to the hills, lest you be swept away.” 18 And Lot said to them, “Oh, no, my lords. 19 Behold, your servant has found favor in your sight, and you have shown me great kindness in saving my life. But I cannot escape to the hills, lest the disaster overtake me and I die. 20 Behold, this city is near enough to flee to, and it is a little one. Let me escape there—is it not a little one?—and my life will be saved!” 21 He said to him, “Behold, I grant you this favor also, that I will not overthrow the city of which you have spoken. 22 Escape there quickly, for I can do nothing till you arrive there.” Therefore the name of the city was called Zoar.

While you may think this article has degenerated into dystopian fiction, and you wouldn’t be entirely wrong, the signs are certainly there that the globohomo agenda has not nearly finished its march across the West, and while I don’t honestly believe that we will reach the level of depravity that the city of Sodom did, and I don’t at all hold run-of-the-mill gays responsible, it would seem that if not lassoed and caged, this beast of sexually-charged violent political progressivism will not stop on its own.

We need to hold every organisation who is supporting or promoting the sexualisation of children to full account, and we need to do it soon, and savagely, because the last time things progressed too far in the West, the end result was the rise of Nazism, and they didn’t tolerate very much deviation from their prescribed norms at all. My personal preference is to return to the Decriminalisation stage, in which we all keep our sex-lives private, and in the public space we adhere to the norms which form the Christian basis of Western Civilisation. In that scenario, nobody at all is flaunting their passions in public view, and people are tolerant and reciprocal in their respect for each other’s privacy and for normal social decency. Sadly, my preferences for the world have little effect on the world, and I think the chances of it going that way are astronomically slim.

If we don’t slow this globohomo beast down, though, or at least convince it one way or another to allow the sane among us to peacefully separate and as such opt out, forming new sovereign states or countries that return to Christian values and conservative behavioural norms, and allowing the “progressive” states to carry on (and good luck to them), then eventually the forward volition will tear us apart. The result of that outcome in the West, I fear, will be much akin to fire and brimstone.

I pray God intervenes before we go the way of Sodom.

Leave a Reply