It’s funny when you start to look back a few years and see what the mainstream media rags that we enjoy mocking so much today were writing. You see, back in 2015, the dunces at The Independent hadn’t quite figured out the logical implications for humanity if their headline is true.
A joint team of American and British scientists have discovered that powerful magnetic pulses to the brain can temporarily change people’s feelings on a variety of subjects – from their belief in God, to their attitude to immigration.
The study, published in the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, saw scientists use a metal coil to create strong magnetic fields around certain parts of the brain.
The non-invasive practice is called trancranial magnetic stimulation, and has can be used to treat depression.
However, researchers have now found that by targeting the part of the brain that deals with threats, they can temporarily change people’s beliefs and views.
The other got a strong pulse of TMS that was strong enough to temporarily shut down their posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), a part of the brain that “plays a key role in both detecting discrepancies between desired and current conditions and adjusting subsequent behaviour to resolve such conflicts.”
In other words, those given the magnetic treatment were found to have decreased beliefs in God and more positive views towards immigrants.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/brain-magnets-decrease-faith-in-god-religion-immigrants-a6695291.html
Now, of all things, this two-part study chose to focus on thoughts and attitudes towards God, and toward immigrants. Surely University of York and UCLA wouldn’t be injecting any ideological bias into their study. Surely they wouldn’t want to be involved in anything that helped develop liberal mind control technology. Surely this wasn’t part of a social engineering program. I shall have to read the study in full to be able to decide.
SPOILER: (The introduction immediately exposes the axiomatic presumption of the “brotherhood of man” globalist mindset being superior and less harmful to human flourishing than parochialism or nationalism.
Parochial ideologies motivate numerous aspects of human social life, from art movements to wars. Moralistic ideologies involving group chauvinism and religion are arguably the most socially impactful—and, at times, the most perniciously divisive.https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/3/387/2375059
What the science successfully illustrates, however, is the correlation between attitudes and behaviours, and the proper functioning of the brain. When we exist in a false state of security (the irrational belief that all danger is taken care of, usually by the State) we are less likely to believe in God. This suggests that, whether you actually believe in God or not, God is an innate psychological insurer of last resort for our will to live, fight, and survive. It also (in the case of this study at least) takes the hindrance of brain function to experience that reduction in faith.
Further, this experiment illustrates that when the region affected by this magnetism (the prefrontal cortex) is reduced or shut down, attitudes towards immigrants improve! So, you literally have to have a malfunctioning brain to stop believing in God, and start believing in open borders (intentional hyperbole)! Yay science!
According to Wikipedia:
Many authors have indicated an integral link between a person’s will to live, personality, and the functions of the prefrontal cortex. This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive behavior, personality expression, decision making, and moderating social behavior. The basic activity of this brain region is considered to be orchestration of thoughts and actions in accordance with internal goals.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefrontal_cortex
The most typical psychological term for functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex area is executive function. Executive function relates to abilities to differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad, better and best, same and different, future consequences of current activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes, expectation based on actions, and social “control” (the ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to socially unacceptable outcomes).
Executive function is another term for agency. Agency is your ability to apply your intelligence, knowledge, and talents, in a manner that establishes patterns of efficacy, success, sustainability, and longevity. High agency is the pattern of people who cultivate practises on an individual or societal level which are based on the accurate perception of long time-horizons. Those who can effectively plan for the future survive the long winter, and as a result, develop wealth. This wealth accumulates in common capital, and a people may expand enough to become a civilisation. When one society has implemented enough collective agency to become a great civilisation, that’s usually when some outsiders show up at the gate either begging for, or demanding, a piece of the pie.
The highest agency societies inevitably became Empires, as they had the science, technology, weaponry, and will to power. In the “post-colonial” age, there is nothing more offensive to liberal sensibilities than the praise of overt Imperialism, and yet the colonisation continues; it’s just done now by lies, obfuscation, and the erosion of national borders and monocultural sovereignty.
High-agency folks understand that open borders will destroy America, and Australia, and Britain, and all of those colonies established by the Anglo-sphere. They register the threat, because their pre-frontal cortex is functioning properly. We’re certainly not allowed by the intellectual gatekeepers to espouse the virtues of British colonialism and the amazing nations it spawned, and yet we all cling to the resulting benefits of those overt “invasions” by our ancestors. Will the west still look the same if the genes of the white people who founded them are diluted into a minority, or eradicated completely? Given that modernity has only really emerged in northern regions like Europe and China, and has only spread by colonialism (state and market), and given that the largest number of immigrants to countries like America are coming from third-world southern regions like Africa and Latin America, there’s a strong case to be made against such a possibility. Not all brains, and correspondingly not all races, are equal in their capacity to build civilisations. This is plainly obvious (though somehow controversial to state out loud) to the fully functional human brain.
Of course, if the melting-pot utopian dream is realised, then all races of the world would become one grey mass, and we’d finally reach equality! Or would we? It’s a big old world, and it’s clear from the political divisions forming in the West alone that not all humans will simply do as they’re told. There will always be ethnic nationalists who wish to preserve the traditions and genes of their own people above others. There will always be “progressives” who want to interfere with those choices by force and subversion. There will also always be a few radical racialists who wish to eradicate certain races from the planet altogether. Not all of these groups can coexists, and so they must separate, or destroy each other. The former would be ideal.
Low agency folks believe in safety in numbers, that calamity will likely never affect them personally, and that the Government will take care of us. They don’t need God. They have the State. And also, there’s no problem with multi-culturalism or globalism, and any suggestion otherwise is simply bigotry, racism, white supremacy, etc. etc. etc. If you press them enough, they will eventually admit that there is a problem, and the problem is this collective of high agency white men. Accept diversity, or be marked for eradication.
The logical implication of this study is that executive functioning has an effect upon an individual’s ability to recognise the existence of God and the presence of veiled threats. There have been other studies into the behavioural effects of large and small amygdala in the mammalian brain, and one of the emergent theories from this study is the r/K selection theory.
I highly recommend the book The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics by Anonymous Conservative, which offers an in-depth analysis of the collective behavioural patterns of animals and humans alike based upon their ability to appropriately perceive and prepare for threats.
Such studies as these just prove, with data, the obvious: Not all brains are equal, and if you can affect the pre-frontal cortex or amygdala development of human beings through dysgenic breeding, indoctrination, propagandisation, lies, deceit, magnetic fields from mobile phones, maybe even 5G radiation (!), then you can dull the sense of threat, and get those borders open!
In short, make people into sheep, and they’re easier to herd around, and if necessary, slaughter. Yay science!