Let’s break up the cabal in Australia!

Who is the cabal?

It has become abundantly clear that the Liberal National Coalition, the Labor Party, and those dreaded communists the Greens, have become a triad of evil. They don’t respect your freedom, your property, your right to an opinion, your right to speak your opinion, your right to bear arms, or to live free of tyranny and exorbitant taxation, nor your right to choose how your tax money is used. These three parties are the cabal, and they are each and all corrupt to their respective cores. They represent a stranglehold on the political landscape which has existed for far too many decades, and now is sliding into positively Orwellian thought-policing, Sharia-apology, and anti-white, anti-family, anti-freedom, anti-Christian, anti-GOD territory!

To break up the cabal you MUST VOTE. If you’re as aware of the genuine groundswell (not the #FakeNews rising Nazis) of rightly disgruntled farmers, labourers, sporting shooters, fisherman, landowners, public commentators, parents, right-wing activists, writers, comedians, musicians, and the rest, then you know as well as I do that there are two directions to move in: a reduction of the grip of power this axis of globalist shills has over our fair country by democratic vote (THIS MONTH), or, further tyranny and persecution, ignorance of the wishes of the silent majority, and, eventually, an unstoppable uprising. Revolution is coming to the West whether we like it or not. I don’t advise it, condone it, or wish for it, but my opinions and wishes have no bearing on the reality that we collectively face. History is clear, and the cycles only change costume and tech. This is the same manifestation of spiritual warfare that has raged since the Tower of Babel.

They will not stop with taxation. They will not stop with censorship. They will not stop with political arrests. They will not stop lying. They will not stop laundering your money into the hands of their Masters, or to imported foreign and culturally incompatible voting blocs, nor will they stop at selling your utilities to foreign powers.

You are a tax slave.
You are human chattel.
You are the property of the State.
Big Brother loves you.

How do we break them up?

It’s simple. You must vote intentionally and make FULL USE of your preferential voting option. Vote BELOW the line, and number your favourite candidates from 1 down to the minimum required number for a passable vote (which is usually printed in the left hand column for each section). If you vote BELOW the line (as you should) then do not also vote ABOVE the line, or your vote will not be counted.

Who is the person/team to put at Number 1?

That is up to you. You should know a bit about the people you choose. You should know what their views are on the topics that are important to you. You should be able to find those answers easily on their websites, and if not, you should email them and ask. But time is running out, so start talking about this with people who know more than you. In my estimation the top questions to ask them are these:

  1. Do you support Australia leaving the United Nations?
  2. Do you support legal protections for the unborn?
  3. Do you believe that multiculturalism can ever work?
  4. Will you protect my right to speak?
  5. Will you reduce the restrictions on our right to bear arms?
  6. Will you end foreign aid and instead keep Australian tax money in Australia, helping farmers and outback communities?
  7. Will you use the full force of the law to stop the rise of violent leftist thugs against everyday, patriotic Australians?

Get those answers in writing if you can; we must always keep a close eye on those in power and hold them accountable. We must be ever vigilant, and we’re only in this mess because we were too trusting as a nation. You might be able to think of more pertinent questions, I’m sure I will too.

My top preferences will be going to Fraser Anning’s Conservative National Party and any of his candidates. I am also a proud new member of this fledgling party (and that has come after much urging from Liberal Democrats, Australian Conservatives, and Liberals to join their mobs). Why did I join? Why do Anning and his candidates get my unconditional support? The answer simple: it’s a state of emergency in our country, and every other person in Parliament has demonstrated equivocation to the social justice mob, apologetic rhetoric for the cult of multiculturalism which is destroying the West, political double-speak over blunt truth-speaking, or ignorance of (or worse, loyalty to) the Global Financial System. Make no mistake, it all comes back to money, and we exist under a global economy that we have never been asked if we WISH TO BE part of.

I don’t expect that every (if any) of Anning’s candidates are “qualified”. I expect some of them will make stupid mistakes, or vote for policies I disagree with, or possibly even become corrupt and seize greater power than they are legally authorised to. Stranger things have happened in the not-so-distant pass. It wasn’t the end of the world. The reason I select these candidates regardless of their qualification or competence is simple: they are part of the only party that is questioning the Cultural Marxism under which we are occupied. They are the MOST opposed to the current cultural and political direction, and therefore they are the proper party to vote for if you want actual change. One Nation isn’t terrible, but it has a leader who repeatedly demonstrates fear and equivocation under pressure. Full respect to Pauline, she is a tough dame, and a national treasure, and she has been at times a lone voice for the average Australian. But Anning is far better built for the job (on a purely optical and rhetorical level, notwithstanding political experience). He’s seen much bigger bullies than the limp-wristed socialists in Parliament, and while they’re not hurling literal sticks and stones at him (which are still safer than the beer bottles he’s no doubt had hurled at him as a publican), their words appear to simply bounce right off. He doesn’t care what they think. He is (so far) immune to shaming. He is a true blue Australian man.

I offer him my support and I pray that God will grant him wisdom and continued courage, and that He will grant us all the same at this time of great turmoil and adventure! We truly live in interesting times.

Revolution is coming one way or another. We have a chance this month to tip it our way so that the revolution remains one of discourse and democracy instead of tribes and civil war. Let’s make sure we engage fully with the democracy we have and see if we can’t at least give the pendulum a big push in the direction of truth and freedom. If we fail, don’t fear, we will prevail in the end. Store up your treasures in Heaven and have faith that the truth MUST win. For lies only exist in the minds and chatter of men, and reality ALWAYS rejects them. After a century of lies, the tide is turning, and truth will stand in the light of the world once more.

Deus vult!

This is a really handy video from my friend Dave Pellowe, explaining some of the basics of how the voting works at the upcoming May 18th federal election. Watch it make sure you understand how the preferential votes system works: if you make a lazy vote, your vote may be abused and go to somehow who does not represent your interests. Use your preferences to ensure you get the government that represents YOU.

Learning to see through our own bullshit.

In a multicultural society that continues to fragment by the day, using words like “evil” and “wrong” (or any of the equivalents they proxy in when one grows old and the people’s ears become numb to them) become less and less convincing. After all, multiculturalism is by definition moral relativism, and because we humans deeply desire order and security, we inevitably tribalise by some standards or others, and in-so-doing secure a likelier future for our genes through our progeny.

“I’m a(n) ________ (insert ideology) because it’s right to ________ and wrong to ____________ so there,” is rhetoric in its most base form. It signifies nothing specific, nor does it make any truth claim; merely implies a whole subculture of thought and tradition by the invocation of the movement’s name. It is merely a declaration of tribal affiliation. But it’s adequate really, because it’s how most people think and always will be, in some iterative form. At least we could try to be honest about such motives, instead of pretending them away with contrived moralisms wielded as weapons of guilt only against our neighbouring tribes and never our own.

I like it better when people are simply honest about their rational self-interest. That’s the real pragmatism.

“I advocate these actions because they will serve me, my family, my people/community (and/or my country). Can’t help everyone.” That kind of view to me is sublimely rational and devoid of any need for moral justification because it’s an amoral and entirely true statement.

And this is how everyday working class folks tend to think. The ones who grow the food and drive the trucks. We ought not overlook them; we do so at our peril.

Questioning Science is blasphemy.

I had a great discussion about a year ago with (my now friend) Grant Davis on the topic of Flat Earth. I was sceptical then, and remain so now, but the topic seems to be popping up again in some of the circles I’m part of, and so as you all should expect of me by now, I plan to give it an earnest look.
A quick YouTube searches yields this National Geographic “vs” video, in which an institute of Scientific Orthodoxy is claiming to take a balanced and scientific look at the flat earth theory.



The result? Propaganda 101:

1 – Make your ideological enemy look as stupid as possible and make his “movement” look like a cult (easy to do with 50 interviewees to choose from and a mandate to edit down to 10 minutes total).

2 – “Steel man” your own ideology; literally. Get the hunkiest science-chad you can find in academia and pay him to talk like a 17-year-old female freshman; “uh, in current year, like, if you question SCIENCE (glory to Me, the God of My own making), you’re a threat to everything!” (that kinda vibe).

3 – Stage a phoney science experiment that actually DOESN’T demonstrate what you want it to (Hint: the shoreline in the distance is ABOVE the hull of the boat, demonstrating that there is probably no curvature across the lake, and the only reason the (hand held) flag appears to be sinking below the “horizon” (which is below the distant shore πŸ€”) is because of a thing called WAVES. The boat has moved beyond the peak of the largest wave approaching the shore. It took me a second to logically reconcile the fact that what they showed is not explained by their Creed: “This can only be caused by curvature of the Earth. Praise be unto the Sphere.”

4 – When your opponent responds to this bogus evidence, cut it down to the most cultish response leaving intelligent viewers to comfortably assume that he saw what we saw, but talking about it goes against MUH SCIENCE (glory to Me, the God of My own making) so they cut it out.

5 – A bit of extra shaming to cap it off: “Do you REALLY believe this? I mean, seriously? This is DANGEROUS, you’re ignorant! You’re denying Science (glory to Me, the God of My own making)!!!”

Now I’m not a subscriber to the flat earth, but I do find it intriguing and there are lots of strong arguments supporting it. If the mainstream media want to really put this ultimate conspiracy theory to bed, they have to DEMONSTRATE their commitment to reason, evidence, and the scientific method instead of just using the LANGUAGE of science (i.e. the religious language which controls the post-enlightenment atheist masses) to shame and ridicule their enemies who are actually using reason, evidence, and the scientific method. Science is not a static THING. It’s a process. If you’ve reached the final answer to an investigation, you’re wrong. Keep going. Keep peeling back the layers of falsehood and inaccuracy, if you can cleanse the deceptions that stop you even getting started.

There are crackpots in every movement, they aren’t hard to find. Want to prove you’re right and win the battle for truth? Put forth a champion against a champion. Put your absolute strongest case forward via your smartest and most well-expressed and educated thinker. But I ask far too much of National Geographic. They’re a magazine, and like all magazines, they exist to sell things, not to be truthful.

When you use the language of morality to try and disprove falsifiable truth claims that pertain to the material universe… you are demonstrating that you are (perhaps unwittingly) part of a cult.

Notice how “Science” has ceased meaning a process by which we rigorously attempt to disprove hypotheses through repeated experimentation and logical analysis of the data… and now it refers to an almighty collective of lab-coat wearing priests who dictate from on high what is ABSOLUTELY TRUE and right and good for the world (and you can bet that includes NO creator, NO four-wheel drives, NO energy independence, NO borders, NO guns to enable you your Natural right of defence, and lots of sodomy for everyone – if you’re not into it, you’re a dinosaur and a bigot).

Can’t wait for more shaming and ridicule from the folks who want to be blocked from further commenting πŸ˜‰ Looking forward even more greatly to legitimate discussion around the topics of flat earth, conspiracies, science, and propaganda. There’s literally nothing more important to be talking about than at least three of those broad topics (because the Truth, if we can discover it, glorifies God and sets us all free).

Scepticism of orthodoxy is apparently hate speech now. 🀑

I’ve just been informed that by suggesting that one should not accept the orthodox holocaust narrative wholesale just because one is told to by authorities, and should instead engage in research and exploration with rational scepticism and an open mind (as with any truth claim which is falsifiable) and in so doing examine evidences which support counter-narratives, and from that fully informed position, make a decision to believe, disbelieve, or remain agnostic… I am apparently an “anti-Semite”.

Never mind that I have friends and close family members who are Jewish or part-Jewish (including my beloved sons). Obviously being sceptical of politically-driven history and aware of the countless times (evident every single day in the mainstream media) for propaganda to promote falsehoods, is tantamount to racial hatred for all people related genetically to the group involved with the topic at hand. πŸ€‘

I guess he got me? πŸ’ͺπŸ‘πŸ˜πŸ‘Œ

The person who accused me of this has “lost all respect” for me.

The person who accused me of this is also off my lawn, for good.

In clown world, full-blown retards believe they have the moral authority to judge the sane. πŸ€‘ Honk! πŸ€£

JFH 88 Jordan vs Vox PART TEN (Rule 4)

Rule Number 4: Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not who someone else is today.

Jordan Peterson vs Vox Day

The Rational Rise.
Real people.
Free thought.

——————————————————–
πŸ’° LIVE DONATIONS: https://therationalrise.com/donate

🍺 TSHIRTS & MUGS ETC: https://therationalrise.com/merch

πŸ’½ MUSIC: http://jamesfoxhiggins.bandcamp.com

πŸ’° PAYPAL DONATIONS: https://paypal.me/jamesfoxhiggins

πŸ‘› BITCOIN: 13jSy2F6e7Xvef4uhThKFaPrwU1QXgJKXr

πŸ“© EMAIL US: [email protected]

πŸ“¨ JOIN OUR MAILING LIST: http://therationalrise.com
οΏΌ
🐦 Twitter: https://twitter.com/jamesfoxhiggins
οΏΌ
🐦 https://twitter.com/rationalrise
οΏΌ
πŸ“Ί Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/therationalrise

πŸ“˜ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/therationalrise/

πŸ“˜ https://www.facebook.com/theJFHshow/

πŸ“· Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jamesfoxhiggins/

πŸ‘„ Gab: /jamesfoxhiggins

πŸ€“ Minds: /JamesFoxHiggins

πŸ‘« MeWe: https://mewe.com/page/5c358c8536caf222f18b4a39

πŸš€ SOCIAL GALACTIC: https://socialgalactic.com/jamesfoxhiggins

πŸ“š BOOKS: https://therationalrise.com/books

🌐 Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/abDmbS4