The permanent stability of our institutions is illusory.

It doesn’t get more clear than this.

This is at least one citizen who answers to the law above men (the constitution) as his judge. It’s a foolish act to be sure as the forensic chances of him getting caught are high. It’s clear from the wording of his bomb threat though, that he would not recognise the legitimacy of those who would lock him up and charge him. This is the crucial psychological shift. We saw it in Anders Breivik’s manifesto, and we saw it in Brenton Tarrant’s too. These men consider themselves to be military operatives on occupied territory. It is that they ceased to recognise the legitimate authority of their governments which allowed them to step over the line.

Human societies need authorities, and this is why men have always employed violence to seize and defend such roles for themselves and their sons. It is also why Christianity was and remains a threat to a totalitarian one-world government and all of its subsidiaries; because Christianity puts family, church, and God above the state. Christ provides the authority that we crave, and his authority is pure, perfect, holy, and just. We look at every King and President below our man Jesus with righteous suspicion. Necessarily, Rome became Christian, and the various monarchs of Europe were always crowned with the support and authority of the Church. We want our rulers to be perfect like Christ, but they seldom are. The point is that we accept their imperfection to the degree that we believe them to still legitimately hold the title. Legitimacy can be proven, or discredited, a number of different ways.

So most people look at this bomb threat and assume that he is a lone-wolf crackpot, and surely doesn’t intend to back this up with actual violence. But if he were not alone, and if we were to see more of these, Americans would begin to realise what a threat they are to their own State’s authority if their revolutionary spirit were to be fully revived. The response to this bomb threat in the media and legislature will likely support the case being made: that the very reason the founding fathers enshrined the protection of the citizen’s right to bear arms is so that they can make such threats to a government planning on subverting their constitutionally protected American freedoms with legitimacy. The credibility of all threats must be carefully measured and weighed before a response is issued.

People are highly intelligent mammals built for survival. We use tools, weapons, natural elements, and our minds to outsmart all our foes (even those with significant physical advantages). Most people can be rounded up like herds into Nation-States, and made happy for a few generations. But if the Nation-State begins to get greedy, or another group of humans find a way to use that Nation-State as an udder, eventually the people to whom the government is supposed to be subservient will form a new government (a rebel government) and work to overthrow the existing rulers and systems.

It has happened in America twice already. It’s happened in Europe countless times. It happens every day. And yet so many want to simply assume the foetal position, suck their thumbs, and rock themselves to sleep chanting “modernity is permanent” or “Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia”. These things have always happened, throughout all recorded history, and we have no reason (other than gullibility to cult indoctrination) to believe that any of our current states or institutions will exist at all in two or three centuries. The world map is a living organism, which is never complete or accurate to the moment.

A polity only needs a sufficient level of suffering and threat to activate the very primal survival mode, in which people invariably revert to the tribe in which they feel the most natural belonging. In melting pot societies, that is not going to be the Nation-State. It may be ideological for some, religious for others, but for most it will likely be racial, and each of those tribes will place themselves, their values, their people, highest among priorities. When the collective loyalty of the people of the USA distributes itself again naturally, as a reaction to the lack of reciprocal loyalty from the government(s), the States will no longer be United at all.

I think it’s utterly beyond contest: we do (as it turns out) live in interesting times. If more of us had been honest all along about the true nature of man and his incessant need to reorganise and start again, we might not be hurtling towards collapse quite so rapidly. In any case, be honest now, and help cushion the fall as best we can.

The Internet is the solution they THINK we can’t control.

I don’t normally spend a great deal of time examining up close the analytics for my social media pages and website. I do this as a passion project, not as a profession (at least not yet) and so I’m often unaware of the things that are key exemplars of the power and value in this thing that I do, that so many others do; veterans and beginners, professionals and plebeians, genuine students of the realm of rational knowledge, and trolls alike.

But when I do look at the stats, I am reliably astounded by a feeling of hope that fills me with great joy to be part of this strange project called Humanity. What a time to be alive!

Of my current ~2700 Facebook “Likes”, here is the demographic breakdown by geography:

(There were also two viewers each from Venezuela [hope you guys are doing okay amidst the near-ruin your country faces; God bless you!] Estonia, Turkey, and Yemen!)

Now sure, these are only minuscule numbers compared to many more successful commentators than I, but the crucial component of this data is the breadth of distribution, not necessarily the volume.

Sometimes, in this age of technological wonder, we become anachronistic as to just how good we have it, and what amazing conveniences and powerful amenities our societies are continuing to perfect. We get caught up in the misery of our disagreements, and our fears for the future. I myself am guilty of this; we lose sight of not only the comforts that we enjoy, but the opportunities we have to completely change the game in our own favour; to not merely undermine, but rather completely bypass the gatekeepers of all our transactions. Every day the collective operationally linguistic genius of our species expands rapidly. Many of us who aren’t in software design, engineering, or Artificial Intelligence development don’t even have the vaguest notion of the ingenuity out there and constantly iterating and strengthening its neural pathways. Many of us speak more of the aesthetics of the world (truth, beauty, and love), rather than the technical, functional, and operationally rational – the language of autists, geeks, and (genuine) scientists.

This collective and amorphous genius I am referring to is the information realm. This realm is not strictly limited the internet at all – the internet is merely the complex series of channels between informational Nodes; human minds. We have, like it or not, formed a collective consciousness, and the internet is the first, but certainly not the best or last, inter-nodal superhighway system connecting practically every mind on the planet. Unless you read a lot of science fiction, or write it (as is my other passion project), you may not have considered the many ways in which this interconnection of the planets minds will manifest in the future, and the ways it will alter the directions of our cultures. Indeed, it already is.

Have you noticed though, that with every new app or social media platform that has brilliant plans to “set us free”, we always see a process of convergence and centralisation (as well as many nuisance forms of monetisation, which we always accept once we are addicted to the conveniences)? It seems to happen every time, and it is because we are using the internet on their terms (the puppet-masters) instead of as a genuine free market, because the cat is out of the bag, and every attempt at controlling the flow of information results in spontaneous expansion of informational genius to route around the dams.

The genie of this hive mind is out of the lamp. If you had one wish, what would it be?

For me, it’s global anarchy (but only on the internet). I don’t mean that as chaos, as many people have conflated it to mean. Chaos is something like what we have now, this tangled mess of billions of Nodes believing their ideas are of specific consequence. The genie is still learning to take a logical form. What I mean by anarchy, is a(n)– (without) –archy (rulers). No monarchs, no presidents, no executive boards, defamation leagues, media moguls, nanny-states, representative democracies, moral police, socialist-media gulags, or corporate cash-traps to stifle and monitor the everyday communications between the people of the world.

None of those dastardly gatekeepers we thought we needed, and we currently think we can’t control.

Actual photo of Google’s primary shareholder.

That said, I also want every nation to have a parallel national internet, which cannot be accessed from abroad, and does not contain any users or content who are located abroad, for the development and enrichment of each nation in competition with the open-borders global internet. Imagine if one particular nation (say Germany, China, or Norway) were to develop its own internet which was so vastly superior in content and messaging than the (potential) cesspool of the world’s totality of ideas, that it shaped and moulded the culture around it (as propaganda tends to) and helped to strengthen the unique identity of its homeland, and invited the envy and competition of those other nations who wish to demonstrably be the best! Some ideas may really be best left out of the memepool, but I believe that individuals should not be denied the choice. Whether or not that choice has legal consequences in the country is only the business of the rulers of those countries (be they ruled by the People or by Sovereigns). This is to say that I don’t deny that there will be countries who choose to make it an act of treason to access the global informational sphere (we are seeing this emerge in Australia and New Zealand with the blocking of Bitchute, Kiwifarms, and more sites which have been deemed beyond the pale.)

If I were the Sovereign ruler of a nation, I would certainly allow people the choice to access the planetary knowledge network, but I might ask them to prove their genuine heart-felt citizenship by regularly taking assessments that grant them license to the full privileges of being a citizen. Not every person would be a full citizen by right, they would need to earn it by continued positive participation in the good of the nation. Luckily for everyone who just shuddered at my bald-faced fascism, I will never be the sovereign ruler of a nation, and this precisely illustrates that my desires, designs, and wishes (and yours too, in fact) have infinitesimal bearing on the ways in which the nations of the planet and the newly forming informational nations are to be shaped and ruled.

Oswald Mosley receiving the European (Roman) salute by his “Black Shirts”, the British Union of Fascists (BUF), who fought desperately to prevent the Second World War and to restore Britain’s economic and political sovereignty and national identity, but who failed to reach the popular success of their ideological contemporaries in Italy and Germany, probably because they didn’t have Gab yet – circa 1936.

How can we make an impact in the shaping and direction of this amazing internet, and how can we enable disruptive permissionless innovation to continue to free us of the pursuits of the geographical rulers (Presidents and Chancellors) so that we can get through this chaotic global conflict and emerge into an optional binary state of cooperation, or separation, as we see fit. Imagine if each community, or each user, was their very own internet, or rather that the interface of your Node (your computer in the most traditional example) was a private server too, and you were able to be absolute monarch of your domain, and create whatever informational utopia you saw fit, and let the direct democracy of the informational free-market decide. It’s what we already do, I’m just talking about cutting out the middlemen.

We can firstly do this by subscribing to paywalled informational hubs which are already using new tools and services to bypass the Triad of Illiberal Orthodoxy; Google, Facebook, and Twitter. This is a painful process to implement at the individual level. We have each become so dependent on the technology, both in hardware and software, designed by a community consisting of California-based tech-nerds, who by-and-large have begun to swallow, espouse, and now even enforce, the political left’s globalist ideological and political biases. We have given them far too much power. These monopolies give us their amazing applications and services for “free”, but as we all know, freedom isn’t free, and it mostly certainly costs you more than a mere Buck-o-Five. It would seem to tragically turn out that the cost of giving all our information, all our connectivity, and all our eyeballs to these platform may be at the Recommended Retail Price of Your Soul, and gradually inflated to Your Children, Your Nation and ultimately, Your World. New software developers are trying transparent and innovative monetisation methods, including cheap all-access subscriptions, cryptocurrency payment systems, and even internal economies (with credits only usable within the particular informational nation).

There is always an array of disruptive competitors who recognise the market forces at play and wish to fulfil your need for privacy, autonomy, and protection against any uninvited indoctrination. Meeting these emerging needs of the third generation to live in the age of the internet (who are so much more worldly than we millennials could have ever hoped to be), is the primary focus of all new content and software creators who plan on still existing in another ten years time.

In this wonderful world of global inter-connectivity, we need to support the development of new systems which subvert and bypass the gatekeepers. These include new social media apps like,,, and the forthcoming rebooted Social Galactic. These include atomised and independent video content delivery systems, be they open social platforms like Bitchute, or private curated on-demand and live-streaming “stations” like Unauthorized.TV, RationalRise.TV, and yes, even Netflix (though I have ended my subscription for this enterprise and encourage you to as well, for its deep and dark subversion of our culture ala Big Brother’s output mind-control content in Orwell’s 1984). These also include revolutionary new models for connectivity and collaboration, such as block-chain technology, most directly evident in BitCoin and its various wannabe competitors, and the Holochain project (for which my friend Moritz Bierling is a developer and advocate).

Bitcoin seems to be mostly flourishing as a currency for trade, and for purchasing license to the information held in other content creators’ server spaces, and perhaps it will triumph as the free global currency of this future iteration of the internet which I am prescribing. That would be an amazing triumph for such a revolutionary technology.

6 Years of historical Bitcoin data, on a logarithmic graph.

The internet is the connecting “matrix” for this informational territory, the hive mind, which actually exists in flesh as neuronal excitations (tiny sparks of electrical energy being blasted as a sort of high speed ‘morse code’ though our Central Nervous System) and inhibitions (the slowing of these action potentials) happening in unfathomable quantities within each and every human and animal brain on the planet.

The information sphere is the one territory in which I see successful international, yes, and even multicultural, co-existence. Sure, some are trying to take a huge steaming dump on that right now, but that is the parasitic, totalitarian Left, who will be wiped off the planet soon enough, until they re-emerge over generations and eventually grovel their way back to influence.

I chat to and receive daily emails from libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, Alt-Righters, Stalinist communists, socialists, white ethno-nationalists, Christian nationalists, Propertarians, preppers, moonies, moon-landing-sceptics, spherical-earth adherents, flat-earth theorists, soldiers, farmers, craftspeople, writers, publishers, YouTubers, artists, musicians, atheists, Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Daoists, Zionists, Anti-Zionists, Australians, Americans, Englishmen, Scotsmen, et. al., as well as Eastern Europeans, Russians, Chinese, Indians, Brazilians, Africans, Germans, Koreans, Japanese, etc. etc. etc.

Kum ba yah, brah!

These daily communiques are positive (though sometimes positively disagreeable) conversations, exchanges, debates, jokes, memes, scriptures, dreams, compliments, and heart-felt well-wishes from people all over the planet. I encounter some occasional rudeness, or attempts to undermine, ridicule, shame, or threaten me, and I’m sure you’ve experienced the same. I don’t keep the pipes to those Nodes open, because those Nodes are leaking toxins into the hive mind and we must deprive them of their access to other Nodes until they learn to behave themselves in a mutually agreeable manner. Isn’t it great that we can do that? In the informational sphere, it is actually possible to be as bullet-proof, as anti-fragile, as Neo in The Matrix.

The slings and arrows of trolls and gammas have no power over the man armoured with reason and fortified with logic.”
– I just made that up now.

We have in our hands the greatest tool ever invented for the international collaboration of all peoples on earth. And we normal, healthy, non-ideologically-possessed human beings, no matter where we’re from, we regular users, are trying every day to strengthen the marketplace of information on that potentially Edenic cyberland. The innovators are creating bypasses around all the off-ramps that have proven to be pitfalls, and we must escape the clutches of the gatekeepers, by having the courage to take our daily Red Honk pills and support these new breakaway communities and disruptive technologies. The Arab Spring would not have happened without Facebook. Brexit would not have happened without Twitter and YouTube. What will Gab and Minds and Social Galactic succeed to bring about?

Don’t you see that there has never been a better time to subvert the subverters? Revolution can happen on any fronts we choose, and the internet should not be the last or least of these, because it is perhaps our greatest worldly treasure.

When we begin to adapt the internet to be less of a chaotic, sprawling bazaar, and more of a planned city, with privately controlled houses around each Node (human mind), then we will begin to see the incredible potential of unmolested informational flow between every nation, faction, township, family, and mind. Then we will witness unimaginable miracles of science and come to understand the ways in which voluntary association and open competition can truly propel the entire world forward; each nation only at its own pace (it’s time to put the Boomers into aged care facilities and stop letting them spread their “peace and democracy” at gunpoint to the whole world, no?)

Go (back to the nursing) home Grandma and Grandpa, you’re both drunk (with power)!

This is only one imagining of the kind of connectivity that is possible, and a very cursory one at that. There is myriad fiction and non-fiction books, code, and engineering designs already in existence which better attest to the near infinitude of possibility for where the “information super-highway” (that’s Boomer-speak for “the Matrix”) can take us. Driving this technological innovation will enable a renaissance for the whole world. We often hear the internet likened to the Gutenberg press in its power to revolutionise the education of the polity. But the Gutenberg press was only the beginning. Now we all have full colour printers in our homes. We’re starting to own 3D printers. We’ve moved way beyond physical limitations. The information flows freer than ever! The internet is so much bigger that the Gutenberg press was, and the renaissance it is bringing is exponentially larger still.

Information is power, and while we all face restrictions on our physical and financial movement in the material world, in the information realm we all have the potential to be truly free. The more we excite the action potentials in the neurons of the collective mind, through stimuli like resistance, heat, and sometimes total severance from toxic Nodes and Hubs, the more we can assist this informational super-being in developing robust and geometrically stable neural pathways, and the more genius our species can become.

You can support our new video on-demand and streaming service at RationalRise.TV

Should convicted “paedovores” be burnt alive? or, See; We can make New Words too!

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.”

Raskolnikov, from Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Crime & Punishment”

This quote is a favourite decontextualised soundbite on the web. Those who have read the classic Russian novel of course know that this theme of new words is taken from Rodion Raskolnikov’s essay in which he justifies the amorality of the exceptional; the dispensing with moral principles by those who prove themselves worthy and willing to act without limit in the pursuit of revolution. Dostoevsky readers also know that, while brilliantly composed and not without shades of truth, Raskalnikov wrote this piece while descending into a murderous insanity.

Have you noticed how much the Regressive Left love to assert their “progress” by inventing such New Words? It’s not enough to be male or female anymore; now we must clarify whether we are cis- male, or trans- male. It’s no longer acceptable to simply be sceptical of the catastrophic effects of this spurious scientific orthodoxy known as “climate change”. You are a climate change denier. Contempt for the barbarism practised and preached in accordance with the Islamic Qur’an is now called Islamophobia, and the adherence to a Biblical view of sex and marriage is now called homophobia. Like so many of the terms which divide and vilify the natural and Christian worldviews, these are all new words.

The distortion of language through indoctrination via academia, entertainment, and news media, has proven to be the first line of offence from the Cultural Marxists in their insatiable march through our institutions and our culture, towards the coming ultimate Luciferian depravity. They failed to win by overt conquest with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but fortunately they had already gained their replacement stronghold in the West, through covert subversion. The intergenerational project of Marxism has been sickeningly successful in the latter part of the 20th century, and people are only becoming wise to it now that we are deep into the 21st.

Many on the Conservative Christian Right expend their energies trying to conserve our language and preserve the meanings of the words that define our Western worldview. But many are beginning to realise that this battle is being quickly lost, and that we must fight on the front presented to us, not the one in distant past. In the immortal words of George Carlin:

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

And so as Christians, Right-Wingers, Nationalists, and Patriots, we must meet our enemy where they stand, and harness control of the words that they so skilfully use against us.

Consider the term given to those who sexually prey upon children:

paedophilia (n.)

1900, from Greek pais (genitive paidos) “child” (see pedo-) + philos “loving” see -phile). First attested in an abstract of a report by Krafft-Ebing.


The term is quite new, though this scourge of sexual depravity against the most vulnerable and innocent among us has surely existed much, much longer. The name was chosen by one man in particular.

Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing (1840-1902; full name Richard Fridolin Joseph Freiherr Krafft von Festenberg auf Frohnberg, genannt von Ebing) was an Austro–German psychiatrist and author of the foundational work Psychopathia Sexualis (1886).


Why Philia? Surely this must have been a mistake… after all, the word originally meant love, and was used in the Bible to describe the love amongst the disciples of Jesus!

philia word-forming element meaning “friendship, fondness, tendency toward,” and in recent use “abnormal attraction to,” from Greek philia “affection,” from philos “loving,” which is of uncertain origin. Related: -philic.


Indeed, Philia is one of the four Greek words for love, each of which feature in the Bible.


“Brotherly love”, and a term used in chemical science to describe chemical attractions that bind various molecules together, or draw them towards each other (e.g. hydrophiles). There is an implication of mutuality, and this is the term used to the describe the brotherly love within the Church; the love of thy fellow brethren in Christ – that irresistible connection you might feel with a stranger who is of similar genetic stock, or of similar religious or ideological persuasion.


Or “affection” as C.S. Lewis called it, is the love that is developed between genuine kin; family members, close friends, and even pets. It is a love that is shared between two or more people who are in close regular contact with one another – less universal than philia.


The highest and most pure love, the love of God for His church, and of Christ for His disciples. Sacrificial, selfless, spiritual love. Think Jesus on the cross. The love we Christians strive to feel and express for our Lord, and with the blessings of the Holy Spirit, a love we might get to experience in small doses and rare moments of connection with our Creator.


Romantic or sexual love; the love felt between a husband and wife. In the strict Biblical sense, this is quite a separate concept from lust (epithumeó) and the basic animal desires that might be attributed to sexual desire outside of a Biblical heterosexual marriage – though of course we all know that the term has long been co-opted to mean “anything that turns you on”, devoid of morality, religion, natural law, or any kind of legitimate love.

Do any of these terms appropriately fit the bill of someone who has an uncontrollable sexual lust for those who are too young to procreate, and too young to consent? I believe not.

I don’t know if others already use this term, but a friend of mine just coined (for me) the term paedovore (or pedovore, for the Americans) to replace the euphemistic “paedophile”. I love children, especially my own, but I am not what we commonly regard as a paedophile (though, in the technical linguistic sense, that’s what all who love children are, including Jesus Christ himself). It would seem that in the strictest use of this relatively new term, the word is wrong!

Paedophilia is commonly understood to mean a sexual desire for children, and given that this cannot be consensual (for children lack the biological requisites for procreation and the neurological development for full agency), and if enacted does irreparable and immeasurable damage to the child and society, it is better framed as a consumption instead of a –philic love (which if applied properly refers to something which of course is entirely wholesome). This euphemistic language is part of why it is apt to be reclassified today as a legitimate sexual preference, and not the sick and damnable disease that it is, worthy in the eyes of many of summary execution when acted upon.

Does this sound far-fetched? Don’t take my word for it. Check out these headlines (articles linked):

The Telegraph: ‘Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’

Independent: Paedophilia a ‘sexual orientation – like being straight or gay’

Wikipedia: North American Man/Boy Love Association

Here’s a list on Wikipedia of all the known groups worldwide committed to celebrating and legalising sexual activity with children. You might be surprised at just how many there are, and given that they have logos and legal organisation names, as well as this published directory, they are not exactly trembling in the shadows:

List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations

The evidence is clear: there is a growing worldwide movement to normalise paedophilia, largely spearheaded by social scientists (on behalf of the sick men who wish to abolish age of consent laws and allow children ‘freedom to choose’), who make the claim that the desire is an unchosen affliction (quite possibly true) but that the demonisation of the desire makes it impossible for the paedophile to come forward for fear of being ostracised or even harmed. Yes, once again, the potential perpetrator is being framed as the victim. The depravity of Social Justice knows no bounds.

Now I don’t believe that this is entirely without truth. It would seem from what we understand that paedophiles may indeed have different brain matter to people who have a normal non-sexual love for children, and they may not be able to control themselves. It may not be a disease at all, but rather an incurable mental defect. So how do we know the difference between those with self-control and those without? These social scientists would have you believe that by creating an inclusive society that treats paedophilia as a normal and acceptable desire, so long as it is not acted upon, we will see fewer crimes committed against innocent children, and more paedophiles seeking psychological care, or permanent solutions like voluntary isolation or chemical castration.

Really? Do we really think that’s where this rapidly progressive, “inclusive” society is headed?

(Look at his Dad. LOOK.)

It wasn’t long after this sexually-enabling appearance on Good Morning America that “Desmond is Amazing”, the “pioneering” drag-kid was filmed dancing in a gay strip club, after dark, for dollar bills. Why are the mainstream media and so many “social scientists” pushing so hard to normalise the sexualisation of children? Surely this can’t be helping those afflicted with the neurological defect we currently call paedophilia.

We have all heard the stories of what goes on in the pools and mansions of Hollywood. We know about what happened to the two Coreys (Feldman and Haim). We know that child sex trafficking is a lucrative business at the (still wide open) US-Mexican border. We know about Jimmy Savile in the UK. We know that the BBC covered for him.

The very walls of BBC buildings in the UK still hold the questionable artworks of known sexual deviant and child-abuser, Eric Gill.

“Prospero and Ariel” sculpture by Eric Gill, Broadcasting House, London.

While the hyper-feminine social engineers want to ensure that we infantilise and make victims out of those who would harm children (while at the same time “believing all women” and claiming there is a “rape culture” in Western nations, where there simply is not – go further East to find the real rape cultures), there are plenty of men in the West who would happily deal with this another way.

Curt Doolittle from the Propertarian Institute suggests less carrot, more stick, and I’m inclined to agree:

–The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla–
From The Propertarian Institute’s website.
… a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.
… b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.
The criteria therefore is:
… i) obsessive or exclusive interest
… ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age.
… iii) by those 16 years of age or older
… iv) and at least five years older.
These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:
… a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.
… b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.
… b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.
… c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.
… d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.
… e) natural experimentation between pubescents.
… f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.
… g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.
… a) consumption of child pornography
… b) obsession in attention, speech, collection
… b) molestation
… c) co-morbidity
… … deficits in response inhibition,
… … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.
… … failed lateralization (ie: they’re feminine)
… … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)
“Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no, and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)
… a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)
… b) developmental trauma (Trigger)
… c) brain trauma (Trigger)
The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.
… a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity
… b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm
… d) Externality – produces vast externalities
… d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible
… e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court:
… … Because the Law must:
… … … Provide restitution
… … … Provide punishment
… … … Prevent repetition or expansion
It is the judgment of the law that:
Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.
Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution
To those incapable of self defence,
And unable to engage in reciprocity,
Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defence of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.
Pedophiles who signal risk, by:
… a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking)
… b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography
… c) molestation
… d) association with one another
… e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above
Shall be permanently removed from the population by:
… i) death by burning for molestation
… i) death by hanging for all other violations
… ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps)
… i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm;
… i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence.
… ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence.
false accusation is:
… a) harmful to the accused
… b) exposes the accused to risk of death
… c) produces vast externalities whether or not true
… d) is closed to restitution
… a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution, ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused.
–This is the Law–

(From: Propertarian Institute Website)

This piece of legal writing was lifted from a social media post by Curt, and is part of the larger body of work he is currently completing with others at the Propertarian Institute; the writing of a new Constitution aiming to complete the scientific method and create a document defining the Natural Law.

In Curt Doolittle’s own words:

“Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.”

Curt Doolittle, Propertarian Institute, Kiev

I’m flattered to see that my comment on that post was incorporated into the website article:

The beauty of this piece of law is that:
Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely.
So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society.
If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

Comment by James Fox Higgins

Civilisation has become feminised to the point of it being unsafe for our children. Laws have become relative in the social justice mode, no longer colour- or class-blind, but now, entirely inverted to protect the wicked, and often punish the innocent. A return to the masculine (dare I say, patriarchal) origins of Western law and norms, one that is intolerant in the extreme – violently so – seems to be the sensible and likely effective recourse for this madness that has turned America, Europe, and soon Australia, into the new Sodom and Gomorrah.

Whether you agree with the harsh stick of Propertarianism’s Natural Law or not, perhaps you would agree that we should at least call the affliction by a proper name, and I don’t think paedophilia cuts it, etymologically or symbolically. After all, as the truism often attributed to Socrates states:

The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms


Are paedophiles actually pederasts (pedo-, child + eros, sexual love)? Or shall we use the Biblical understanding of eros as a divine and true sexual love, and not a mere animal lust and malevolence, to inform us?

I would argue that, in the spirit of the linguistic and rhetorical battleground to which we have been driven by agents of Satan, these purveyors of the lies at the heart of the Social Justice movement, we must take the offensive, and brand those with the desire to corrupt the innocence of children with their depraved and highly destructive lust with a name as insidious as the fallout of their crimes: they are the eaters of children. They are Kindlifresser.

They are paedovores.

Kindlifresser or the child eater fountain in Bern, Switzerland.

On Robert Heinlein’s sympathy for fascism

“Liberty is never unalienable; it must be redeemed regularly with the blood of patriots or it always vanishes. Of all the so-called natural human rights that have ever been invented, liberty is least likely to be cheap and is never free of cost.”

Robert A. Heinlein – Starship Troopers (1959)

Somebody recently had a go at me for expressing my admiration for the writings of Robert A. Heinlein (who I consider to be one of the most rational and hilarious sci-fi writers of the 20th century) because he “sympathised with fascism”. 

Honestly, if you can’t sympathise with fascism at all you probably don’t know what it is, or you’ve been indoctrinated into conflating the term with moralistic notions. All of history has been human tyranny. Some tyranny works, some doesn’t. Some is murderous to outsiders, some is subversive to its own people. Even liberty has proven to be destructive and unsustainable in some ways. There are plenty of good things to say about fascism, and you throw out the baby with the bathwater at your peril. I mean, sanctimonious moral posturing aside, how well is the West doing under universal suffrage? Looked like it could have been good, but it’s in tremendous decay now. Can we regain our liberties as a people in the long-run without significant sacrifices in the shorter-term? Will pleading and begging and trying to convince the polity through strong arguments actually bring the libertarian cause to victory?

“The instinct to survive is human nature itself, and every aspect of our personalities derives from it. Anything that conflicts with the survival instinct acts sooner or later to eliminate the individual and thereby fails to show up in future generations. . . . A scientifically verifiable theory of morals must be rooted in the individual’s instinct to survive–and nowhere else!–and must correctly describe the hierarchy of survival, note the motivations at each level, and resolve all conflicts.
We have such a theory now; we can solve any moral problem, on any level. Self-interest, love of family, duty to country, responsibility toward the human race . . . .
The basis of all morality is duty, a concept with the same relation to group that self-interest has to individual.” 

Robert A. Heinlein – Starship Troopers (1959)

We will return to aristocracy, and hierarchical top-down rule by sovereigns. Nothing lasts forever, but that will be the model for the 21st century, and when we get there, we’ll probably all find that it’s better for the nation(s) than the slow decay of democracy. I’m not saying it’s perfect or absolutely stable. But compared to what? Give me a Christian monarch over the tyranny of the (increasingly parasitic) majority, any day.

People who say “fascism is evil” (and similar moronic conflations) are usually just trying to cover for their own ignorance, cowardice, or the evil they hide in their own closets. 

Robert Heinlein was a great writer BECAUSE he was rational enough to sympathise with fascism.

I’ll leave you today with an excerpt from the screenplay by Edward Neumeier for the 1997 film of Starship Troopers. It’s another good example of the rational separation of moralism (rhetoric/emotional arguments from authority) from empiricism (what actually happens, how things actually work, despite our feelings about them and our wishes).


 is beautiful, just 18, and quite pleased with herself  because
 Johnny Rico is clearly infatuated with her.

 The end of another school year, and for 
 me no doubt another failure...
 Rico, pay attention !

 The teacher JEAN RASCZAK, 38, a rugged veteran who proudly displays his missing hand, scowls at Johnny, bemused.

 Sorry, Mr. Rasczak.

 But as soon as Rasczak turns back to the class, Johnny begins to sketch a cartoon on his desk's touch screen.

 Here in History and Moral Philosophy
 we've explored the decline of 
 Democracy when social scientists brought
 the world to the brink of chaos, and how the 
 veterans took control and imposed a stability 
 that has lasted for generations since...
 You know these facts but have I taught you
 anything of value ? You.
 Why are only citizens allowed to vote ?

 Rasczak points at LANNY, 17, with his stump.

 It's a reward... what the Federation gives you
 for doing Federal Service.

 Rasczak is crestfallen, makes a big show of patience.

 No. Something given has no value!
 Haven't I taught you dimwits anything?
 I guess they ought to revoke my 
 teaching credential...

 Laughter. Johnny's cartoon, meanwhile, is taking shape: Johnny and Carmen flying round planet Venus in a space ship.

 When you vote, you're exercising political
 authority. You're using force. And force, my
 friends, is violence, the supreme authority
 from which all other authority derives.

 CARL JENKINS, 18, a superintelligent geek, jumps in.

 Gee, we always thought you were the
 supreme authority, Mr. Rasczak.

 Laughter. Rasczak grins.

 In my classroom, you bet. Whether it's 
 exerted by ten or ten billion, political 
 authority is violence by degree. The 
 people we call citizens have earned
 the right to wield it.

 DIZZY FLORES, 18, athletic, pretty, no nonsense, chimes in.

 My mother always says that violence
 never solves anything.

 Really ? I wonder what the city fathers of
 Hiroshima would have to say about that.

 Rasczak points at Carmen.

 They probably wouldn't say anything.
 Hiroshima was destroyed.

Johnny presses "SEND" on his desk, and the cartoon appears across the way on Carmen's screen.

 Correct. Naked force has settled more
 issues in history than any other factor.
 The contrary opinion 'violence never
 solves anything' is wishful thinking
 at its worst.

While Rasczak looks away, Carmen throws Johnny her wonderful smile, and Johnny's gone, checked out, flying round Venus.

 People who forget that always pay...
 They pay with their lives and their

 Dizzy notices the dreamy look on Johnny's face.
 So does Rasczak. He points at him with his stump,
 snaps Johnny to.

 You. Tell me the moral difference,
 if any, between the citizen and the civilian ?

 The difference lies in the field of civic
 virtue. A citizen accepts personal
 responsibility for the safety of the body politic,
 of which he is a member, defending it,
 if need be, with his life.
 The civilian does not.

 The exact words of the text. But do
 you understand it ?
 Do you believe it ?

 Uh, I don't know.

 Of course you don't. I doubt if any 
 of you here would recognize 'civic virtue'
 if it bit you in the ass.

 A bell rings. Rasczak shrugs, indifferent.

 Well, that's it. Have a nice life.