📺 TONIGHT: The Eugenics of Arranged Marriage

7pm (Sydney time) tonight on YouTube.

SPECIAL GUEST: Noah Revoy from SMV4K.com

After a 2-week hiatus due to sickness, dog-fence dramas, novel writing, and family life, Foxy is back for a discussion with Noah Revoy on the virtues of arranged marriage as one of the best forms of eugenics. Check in and check it out! Say g’day if you’re in the chats, and smash the 👍

Jewish supremacy on proud display in Salon.

I’m repeatedly surprised to see some of the most hostile voices against white nationalism coming from Jews, some of whom would consider themselves Zionists. Surely of all people the Jews know best what a horror-show life can be for your people when you are unable to call a region of land your sovereign home. Israel finally exists on the map, and I’m glad the Jewish people can be united in one place they call their own. They have walls and fences, they have a formidable military force, and they have very tight race-based immigration laws. Israel gets it, man! But why are so many of them radically opposed to the idea of whites having such a sovereign home which they can defend? Shall there not be a country for whites… anywhere, ever?! Seems weirdly inconsistent to me.

SALON: White nationalism can be uprooted in America: Here’s how

Rabbi Michael Lerner recently jotted down on some left-wing propaganda blog called “Salon” some of his ideas to ensure that white nationalism is stopped, specifically because he believes a resurgence in white nationalist attitudes will necessarily result in the systematic extermination of the Jews (as if we white people weren’t already taught that Hitler and the Nazis are the worst things ever).

Trump’s legitimation [sic] of using violence against those at his rallies who challenge the white nationalism that he labels as “America First” — and the violence he has authorized against powerless refugees at our borders — sends the message that violence is OK.

Scenes from the edge of the world’s moral utopia, Israel.

So… what about the Palestinians at the walls of Israel’s borders? Would Lerner advise that the morally correct action would be to let them all in? Aren’t they just powerless refugees? Surely such moral principles are universal to all humanity. Well, credit where its due, based on a quick scan of Lerner’s career highlights on Wikipedia, it would seem that maybe he does agree. He’s highly critical of Israel, apparently. Fair game. But should a people not be able to decide whether they want foreign neighbours entering their commons or not? If we extend the principle of the open borders for which Lerner advocates, do we not necessarily have to give up familial autonomy and the right to lock our own doors? What about the universal human right to freedom of association? The right to private property? After all, Lerner claims that the Jews have been the world’s biggest advocates for universal human rights:

Why Jews? First, because Jews have been the most consistent allies of African Americans and refugees. Second, because while our culture has devoted considerable energy to exposing the distortions of racism against African Americans, and to some extent Native Americans, and has also done mass education against sexism and homophobia, there has never really been an exploration of, and public education about, hatred of Jews.

That last statement doesn’t quite align with my memory of a public school education. I was told pretty repeatedly about Hitler, the Nazis, and everything that was done to the Jews by Christians throughout history. I even felt guilty about it for some of my youth! But hey, maybe that was just my one school in a backwater town in Australia.

There’s also that fascinating documentary by Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir, which is entitled Defamation. It’s all about the way in which Jewish youths are indoctrinated from birth to believe that their people are not only God’s chosen flock, but also that because of this and jealousy (among other reasons), everyone else hates them especially. The documentary demonstrates the hysterical heights to which the emotions of the young Israeli Jews are pushed in order to feel a deep connection with their ancestry and the tragedies of their people’s past, and also the fervour with which the Anti-Defamation League police the streets and all public forums for anything remotely indicative of hatred or suspicion of Jews, or any particular Jew. I suppose the logic is if you criticise or revile one Jew, you must hate them all.

I’m not sure what the hell Lerner is talking about here, but it seems to me extremely clear that the whole western world has heard quite a lot from Jews about hatred of Jews. I’ve certainly heard much more concern about antisemitism than have I witnessed any genuine racial hatred towards Jews.

… that hatred is part of Christian privilege in this country. It is deeply rooted in the teachings of the Gospels that claimed Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus, not the Romans who actually did it. [CITATION NEEDED] In the Middle Ages, Jews were forbidden from owning land and from joining guilds. This left most Jews barely surviving and living in conditions of great poverty. A handful were allowed to become traders, and as these became successful the myth spread that Jews had more money and power than everyone else. During the Holocaust many of the German churches continued to teach hatred of Jews.
Sadly, today even the most tolerant and Jewish-friendly churches fail to denounce the extreme hatred of Jews in the teachings of Martin Luther and other Protestant theologians, or to challenge it when it pops up among people of color. Even some of the most progressive churches fail to teach their own students in Sunday school about the notorious lies about Jews spread by Christianity throughout much of its history. 

Aren’t we so lucky that we have the honesty and wisdom of Rabbis like Michael Lerner to educate us so succinctly on the cruelty of our people and our religion towards his throughout history, and also to correct all our misconceptions? Wouldn’t want to put the Gospels (as written) above the perspective of this non-Christian thinker. After all, what is Christianity without Rabbinic Judaism? Oh that’s right… It’s devotion to the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Or am I displaying my Christian privilege? I’m sure the Talmud doesn’t say anything remotely mean or “othering” about Christians and goyim in general.

“Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15)

Of course, I’m sure there is context and a broader spiritual message to consider here that might demonstrate that this is not goyim-hatred or Jewish privilege at play. Benefit of the doubt, and all that.

So what shall we do next, wise Rabbi, to ensure that our people never subjugate your people again?

The first thing we must do is to insist that the federal government provide free security forces to every place of worship and every public school that has a reason to feel in danger of violence.

Free? Do you mean a voluntary people’s militia? Great idea! Every man a sheriff. I like it! Oh wait… the federal government is supposed to provide it? Oh… you mean the military. I guess free ain’t really free. I wonder which demographic will foot most of that bill.

White nationalist extremism, not families seeking asylum on our borders, is the real national emergency. At the same time, the government should make illegal the possession of assault-style weapons and the possession of more than one gun or rifle of any sort, and should engage in a campaign to collect those guns.

[Citation needed to define “white nationalist extremism” – would that just be if white people in America or Europe or Australia started doing what Jews in Israel do?]

Hmmm… ban all “assault-style” guns (a phoney rhetorical category)… by using soldiers with (assault style) guns to “collect” guns from the citizens? What could possibly go wrong?

(Your average American man when he hears the words “radical gun reform”)

Seems like a call to dismantle the American constitution to me… but I must be reading it wrong. After all, didn’t the good Rabbi say that he and his fellow Jews are the greatest allies of America? Let’s check that quote.

Jews have been the most consistent allies of African Americans and refugees

Next, we need to mandate that every school and college that seeks to retain accreditation or receive public funds or student loans must implement a required course at every grade level to teach about the history and dangers of racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, immigrant-bashing and other forms of “othering.” We must also teach what becomes of nations that abandoned democracy and human rights and the disasters that ensued.

“…what becomes of nations that abandoned democracy and human rights…”

But don’t worry, he’s not finished yet:

Finally, we need to ask the Christian world to teach about its role in promoting anti-Semitism in the past, acknowledge that the Gospels are flawed in contributing to hatred of Jews, and develop with Jewish progressives a comprehensive educational agenda to uproot this legacy from their midst.

So… to prevent the rise of White Nationalism, Rabbi Lerner suggests that the non-whites and their elected representatives use the full force of the government purse, military, and law enforcement arms to:

  • Protect places of worship and schools with guns (free of charge).
  • Scratch out the 2nd Amendment.
  • Take the guns from the citizens (with the guns of the state).
  • Open the borders, thus ending American sovereignty.
  • Take the children and force-feed them propaganda (more than they are already doing).
  • Threaten to defund and delegitimise any school or university which doesn’t enforce the narrative of white guilt and oppression.
  • “ask the Christian world to teach about its role in promoting anti-Semitism in the past”

On the last point, why just ask? Why not use the same thinly-veiled violent methods you proposed for the other points? Why not completely repeal the 1st Amendment too, and use those federally funded soldiers you’ve just appropriated to “guard” the insides of Christian churches and ensure that your prescribed narrative is being appropriately taught.

The reason is clear: overt promotion of violence is antithetical to the United Nations created narrative of the “brotherhood of man”, and so violence (though impossible to ever remove from the equation, as it is the ultimate arbiter of power in any given situation) is moved into the shadows, and becomes subversive, covert, occult, and even becomes represented by Newspeak which distracts the simple-minded from the principle of violence at its core. This is why he can have the audacity to suggest that the Church must:

… develop with Jewish progressives a comprehensive educational agenda to uproot this legacy from their midst.

He is literally calling for the Judaification of the Holy Bible. He’s suggesting that the liberal, immigrant, non-white, refugee, progressive, atheist, and Jewish (but I repeat myself) communities band together to “ask” the Church (politely, no doubt) to reject their Holy Bible, and reject the teachings of the apostles and church fathers, and re-write them in the Rabbinic interpretation, in order to ensure that Christians (and more broadly whites) know their place.

Honestly, I don’t know how an article making such recommendations for America and Christianity writ large which are so inherently antithetical to Constitutionally-enshrined American rights like freedom of speech, freedom of association (which necessarily includes freedom of disassociation), and the uninfringed right to bear arms, can be seen as anything short of treasonous anti-American subversion. He’s literally calling for violent action to remove guns and traditional Christian beliefs from (specifically) white people.

It seems pretty clear that Rabbi Lerner is a racist, a megalomaniac, and a Jewish supremacist hell-bent on the subjugation of the white race.

Lerner is promoting revenge politics, and worse, vengeance upon the progeny of his ancestors’ (alleged) oppressors (i.e. Christendom). An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, as it were. Worse, he’s not doing it honestly, he’s changing the meaning of words and ideas and claiming that this vengeance is actually an act of love! This is the rejection of Christ (and of Logos) at its most profane.

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

Isaiah 5:20

If Rabbi Lerner honestly believes that following his prescribed actions will quell the rise of white nationalism, he’s really lost the plot. The return to ethnic nationalism is the restoration of the family writ large, and it is something possibly best exemplified within Jewish culture – what other tribe has demonstrated a greater in-group preference and cultural solidarity in the last century?

Lerner frames his critique of white nationalism as a response to the atrocious murder of 11 people at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburg late last year, because the suspect in the shooting, Robert Bowers, was overtly hateful towards Jews on social media, and also had white nationalist political views. Lerner’s article offers no exploration or context relating to this crime, but uses the image of the Synagogue in question and a caption about the crime to create a false correlation between white nationalism and the desire to murder Jews. I mean, sure, there are some crazy psychos out there, but does he really mean to suggest that ethno-nationalism is necessarily and inherently a murderous ideology? That’d be like saying that putting the interests of your own family above others is “familial supremacy” and somehow morally wrong per se because it oppresses other families. Nobody is that stupid, are they? Oh wait…

Okay, so some social psychology professors at City University of New York are that stupid.

Perhaps it was not the white nationalism that led Bowers to murderous derangement, but something else… hmmm…

Robert Gregory Bowers (born September 4, 1972), a 46-year-old resident of Baldwin, Pennsylvania, was arrested as the suspected shooter. Bowers’ parents divorced when he was about one year old. His father reportedly committed suicide at the age of 27, when Bowers was about 6 years old. Bowers’ mother remarried to a Florida man when Bowers was a toddler, and he lived with them in Florida until they separated a year after their marriage. Upon returning to Pennsylvania, Robert and his mother lived with his mother’s parents in Whitehall. His grandparents took responsibility for raising him, because his mother suffered from health problems… Neighbors described Bowers as “a ghost” and said he rarely interacted with others.


Any genuine practising Christian naturally abhors collectivised hatred, and indeed strives to remove all hatred from his heart. We love our neighbours and our enemies alike, and as an act of love we try to speak the truth, because words which accurately and meaningfully describe reality are our human expression of the logos, and they glorify God. Conflation is the commonest form of deception, and lies are the weapons of Satan. The desire for national sovereignty, ethnic identity, and the preservation of one’s own culture and commons is NOT tantamount to hatred or murderous ideology at all. Many European nationalists firmly believe that Jews, Muslims, Africans, Asians, and any other collective who have in-group preference should be free to form a sovereign geographical home and sustain and develop it unmolested by invaders or globalist do-gooders. Is this not simply an extension of the hypothetically unalienable right to start a family, build a walled garden and castle in which to raise it, and implement exclusive sovereignty over that terrain? Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike agree that Heaven itself has a wall and a strict immigration policy; they just disagree on what that policy states.

It is only Hell has that truly open borders.

Many nationalists also believe that fervent multiculturalists should be able to have their own multi-ethnic states too (and good luck to them) but that doesn’t include a right to invade, subvert, or become parasitic towards the ethno-states. One natural law for all peoples, whether they are united by ideology or genetics. It doesn’t get less bigoted than that.

Lerner is one of the many progressive globalist activists who spread the false dichotomy that if you’re not for open borders, absolute multiculturalism, and global hegemony, then you are a white supremacist mass-murderer-in-waiting.

It is views and subversive tactics like Lerner’s that invite hatred, and it’s not because of his race at all, but rather because of his deceitful, destructive and ultimately illiberal ideas. Fortunately, despite the contra being shouted at us repeatedly from birth, most white Christians would be smart and compassionate enough to recognise that Rabbi Lerner is not all Jewish people. After all, painting all Jews with the same brush would be bigotry, and we can’t have that now, can we?

Westpac Bank slits its own throat.

In the age of Social Justice and Political Correctness, it is not enough for people to make their own discerning judgements about who to do business with and who to avoid; we now require corporations to do that thinking for us, and enforce it!

Westpac has closed the bank accounts of right wing commentator Blair Cottrell. I wonder how this sort of action will be viewed 50 years from now. 🤔

They are certainly not the first bank to start kowtowing to the mob of raving lunatics who demand not only the silencing and censorship of infidels like Blair, but also their complete and total un-personing, and financial ostracism and ruination.

The tone of the email from Westpac to their now evicted customer is not one of aggression or self-righteousness, but rather one of cowardice and obfuscation. It’s a “commercial” decision, and they have the “Terms and Conditions” to back it up, though they refuse to provide further information about which T&C’s Blair has breached.

It’s plainly obvious that Antifa or some other left-wing activist group has found out that Blair was a Westpac customer, and they have applied pressure to the bank and likely threatened them, in the same way that Dia Beltran’s place of employment was threatened until she was fired, or any of the other countless examples of this kind of mob attack for political reasons across the Western sphere.

The mainstream social media websites like Facebook and YouTube have rendered themselves unusable for anyone right of Stalin, and we are now seeing major corporate ISP’s like Telstra follow suit with the IP blocking of Bitchute and Gab. Next come the banks. In a future cashless society, there’s no doubt that people like Blair, and probably me, and probably you, will be rendered persona non grata and unless we get ourselves microchipped and pledge our undying allegiance to globohomo…

What we can see demonstrated in this strategy of the globalist communist trans activists (i.e. the servants of Satan) is that they will not be satisfied until they control everyone, everything, and until anyone who disagrees with them or wishes to change the course of our culture towards something more traditional, wholesome, or homogeneous is dead or rotting away in a gulag.

Or did you think they were all about diversity?

One thing is certain: we create that which we obsessively fear the most. The globalists fear the rise of ethno-nationalism more than anything, because they know they have no place in it (and that includes the corporations who have declared their fealty), and yet every move they make seems to ensure that the threat which really didn’t exist in any significant way 20 years ago is going to rear its head, and be far less apologetic, reasonable, and inclusive than before.

I hope that the people who are out to destroy the lives of folks like Blair are eating plenty of protein and pumping iron, because when the tables of these temple merchants and peddlers of perversion are finally flipped, I don’t expect that the right will show any more mercy than they are currently receiving. And why should anyone?


Not all brains are equal.

It’s funny when you start to look back a few years and see what the mainstream media rags that we enjoy mocking so much today were writing. You see, back in 2015, the dunces at The Independent hadn’t quite figured out the logical implications for humanity if their headline is true.

HEADLINE: Disabling parts of the brain with magnets can weaken faith in God and change attitudes to immigrants, study finds

A joint team of American and British scientists have discovered that powerful magnetic pulses to the brain can temporarily change people’s feelings on a variety of subjects – from their belief in God, to their attitude to immigration.

The study, published in the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, saw scientists use a metal coil to create strong magnetic fields around certain parts of the brain.

The non-invasive practice is called trancranial magnetic stimulation, and has can be used to treat depression.

However, researchers have now found that by targeting the part of the brain that deals with threats, they can temporarily change people’s beliefs and views.

The other got a strong pulse of TMS that was strong enough to temporarily shut down their posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), a part of the brain that “plays a key role in both detecting discrepancies between desired and current conditions and adjusting subsequent behaviour to resolve such conflicts.”

In other words, those given the magnetic treatment were found to have decreased beliefs in God and more positive views towards immigrants.


Now, of all things, this two-part study chose to focus on thoughts and attitudes towards God, and toward immigrants. Surely University of York and UCLA wouldn’t be injecting any ideological bias into their study. Surely they wouldn’t want to be involved in anything that helped develop liberal mind control technology. Surely this wasn’t part of a social engineering program. I shall have to read the study in full to be able to decide.

SPOILER: (The introduction immediately exposes the axiomatic presumption of the “brotherhood of man” globalist mindset being superior and less harmful to human flourishing than parochialism or nationalism.

Parochial ideologies motivate numerous aspects of human social life, from art movements to wars. Moralistic ideologies involving group chauvinism and religion are arguably the most socially impactful—and, at times, the most perniciously divisive.


What the science successfully illustrates, however, is the correlation between attitudes and behaviours, and the proper functioning of the brain. When we exist in a false state of security (the irrational belief that all danger is taken care of, usually by the State) we are less likely to believe in God. This suggests that, whether you actually believe in God or not, God is an innate psychological insurer of last resort for our will to live, fight, and survive. It also (in the case of this study at least) takes the hindrance of brain function to experience that reduction in faith.

Further, this experiment illustrates that when the region affected by this magnetism (the prefrontal cortex) is reduced or shut down, attitudes towards immigrants improve! So, you literally have to have a malfunctioning brain to stop believing in God, and start believing in open borders (intentional hyperbole)! Yay science!

According to Wikipedia:

Many authors have indicated an integral link between a person’s will to live, personality, and the functions of the prefrontal cortex.[2] This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive behavior, personality expression, decision making, and moderating social behavior.[3] The basic activity of this brain region is considered to be orchestration of thoughts and actions in accordance with internal goals.[4]
The most typical psychological term for functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex area is executive function. Executive function relates to abilities to differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad, better and best, same and different, future consequences of current activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes, expectation based on actions, and social “control” (the ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to socially unacceptable outcomes).


Executive function is another term for agency. Agency is your ability to apply your intelligence, knowledge, and talents, in a manner that establishes patterns of efficacy, success, sustainability, and longevity. High agency is the pattern of people who cultivate practises on an individual or societal level which are based on the accurate perception of long time-horizons. Those who can effectively plan for the future survive the long winter, and as a result, develop wealth. This wealth accumulates in common capital, and a people may expand enough to become a civilisation. When one society has implemented enough collective agency to become a great civilisation, that’s usually when some outsiders show up at the gate either begging for, or demanding, a piece of the pie.

The highest agency societies inevitably became Empires, as they had the science, technology, weaponry, and will to power. In the “post-colonial” age, there is nothing more offensive to liberal sensibilities than the praise of overt Imperialism, and yet the colonisation continues; it’s just done now by lies, obfuscation, and the erosion of national borders and monocultural sovereignty.

High-agency folks understand that open borders will destroy America, and Australia, and Britain, and all of those colonies established by the Anglo-sphere. They register the threat, because their pre-frontal cortex is functioning properly. We’re certainly not allowed by the intellectual gatekeepers to espouse the virtues of British colonialism and the amazing nations it spawned, and yet we all cling to the resulting benefits of those overt “invasions” by our ancestors. Will the west still look the same if the genes of the white people who founded them are diluted into a minority, or eradicated completely? Given that modernity has only really emerged in northern regions like Europe and China, and has only spread by colonialism (state and market), and given that the largest number of immigrants to countries like America are coming from third-world southern regions like Africa and Latin America, there’s a strong case to be made against such a possibility. Not all brains, and correspondingly not all races, are equal in their capacity to build civilisations. This is plainly obvious (though somehow controversial to state out loud) to the fully functional human brain.

Of course, if the melting-pot utopian dream is realised, then all races of the world would become one grey mass, and we’d finally reach equality! Or would we? It’s a big old world, and it’s clear from the political divisions forming in the West alone that not all humans will simply do as they’re told. There will always be ethnic nationalists who wish to preserve the traditions and genes of their own people above others. There will always be “progressives” who want to interfere with those choices by force and subversion. There will also always be a few radical racialists who wish to eradicate certain races from the planet altogether. Not all of these groups can coexists, and so they must separate, or destroy each other. The former would be ideal.

Low agency folks believe in safety in numbers, that calamity will likely never affect them personally, and that the Government will take care of us. They don’t need God. They have the State. And also, there’s no problem with multi-culturalism or globalism, and any suggestion otherwise is simply bigotry, racism, white supremacy, etc. etc. etc. If you press them enough, they will eventually admit that there is a problem, and the problem is this collective of high agency white men. Accept diversity, or be marked for eradication.

The logical implication of this study is that executive functioning has an effect upon an individual’s ability to recognise the existence of God and the presence of veiled threats. There have been other studies into the behavioural effects of large and small amygdala in the mammalian brain, and one of the emergent theories from this study is the r/K selection theory.

I highly recommend the book The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics by Anonymous Conservative, which offers an in-depth analysis of the collective behavioural patterns of animals and humans alike based upon their ability to appropriately perceive and prepare for threats.

Such studies as these just prove, with data, the obvious: Not all brains are equal, and if you can affect the pre-frontal cortex or amygdala development of human beings through dysgenic breeding, indoctrination, propagandisation, lies, deceit, magnetic fields from mobile phones, maybe even 5G radiation (!), then you can dull the sense of threat, and get those borders open!

In short, make people into sheep, and they’re easier to herd around, and if necessary, slaughter. Yay science!

The permanent stability of our institutions is illusory.

It doesn’t get more clear than this.

This is at least one citizen who answers to the law above men (the constitution) as his judge. It’s a foolish act to be sure as the forensic chances of him getting caught are high. It’s clear from the wording of his bomb threat though, that he would not recognise the legitimacy of those who would lock him up and charge him. This is the crucial psychological shift. We saw it in Anders Breivik’s manifesto, and we saw it in Brenton Tarrant’s too. These men consider themselves to be military operatives on occupied territory. It is that they ceased to recognise the legitimate authority of their governments which allowed them to step over the line.

Human societies need authorities, and this is why men have always employed violence to seize and defend such roles for themselves and their sons. It is also why Christianity was and remains a threat to a totalitarian one-world government and all of its subsidiaries; because Christianity puts family, church, and God above the state. Christ provides the authority that we crave, and his authority is pure, perfect, holy, and just. We look at every King and President below our man Jesus with righteous suspicion. Necessarily, Rome became Christian, and the various monarchs of Europe were always crowned with the support and authority of the Church. We want our rulers to be perfect like Christ, but they seldom are. The point is that we accept their imperfection to the degree that we believe them to still legitimately hold the title. Legitimacy can be proven, or discredited, a number of different ways.

So most people look at this bomb threat and assume that he is a lone-wolf crackpot, and surely doesn’t intend to back this up with actual violence. But if he were not alone, and if we were to see more of these, Americans would begin to realise what a threat they are to their own State’s authority if their revolutionary spirit were to be fully revived. The response to this bomb threat in the media and legislature will likely support the case being made: that the very reason the founding fathers enshrined the protection of the citizen’s right to bear arms is so that they can make such threats to a government planning on subverting their constitutionally protected American freedoms with legitimacy. The credibility of all threats must be carefully measured and weighed before a response is issued.

People are highly intelligent mammals built for survival. We use tools, weapons, natural elements, and our minds to outsmart all our foes (even those with significant physical advantages). Most people can be rounded up like herds into Nation-States, and made happy for a few generations. But if the Nation-State begins to get greedy, or another group of humans find a way to use that Nation-State as an udder, eventually the people to whom the government is supposed to be subservient will form a new government (a rebel government) and work to overthrow the existing rulers and systems.

It has happened in America twice already. It’s happened in Europe countless times. It happens every day. And yet so many want to simply assume the foetal position, suck their thumbs, and rock themselves to sleep chanting “modernity is permanent” or “Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia”. These things have always happened, throughout all recorded history, and we have no reason (other than gullibility to cult indoctrination) to believe that any of our current states or institutions will exist at all in two or three centuries. The world map is a living organism, which is never complete or accurate to the moment.

A polity only needs a sufficient level of suffering and threat to activate the very primal survival mode, in which people invariably revert to the tribe in which they feel the most natural belonging. In melting pot societies, that is not going to be the Nation-State. It may be ideological for some, religious for others, but for most it will likely be racial, and each of those tribes will place themselves, their values, their people, highest among priorities. When the collective loyalty of the people of the USA distributes itself again naturally, as a reaction to the lack of reciprocal loyalty from the government(s), the States will no longer be United at all.

I think it’s utterly beyond contest: we do (as it turns out) live in interesting times. If more of us had been honest all along about the true nature of man and his incessant need to reorganise and start again, we might not be hurtling towards collapse quite so rapidly. In any case, be honest now, and help cushion the fall as best we can.

The Internet is the solution they THINK we can’t control.

I don’t normally spend a great deal of time examining up close the analytics for my social media pages and website. I do this as a passion project, not as a profession (at least not yet) and so I’m often unaware of the things that are key exemplars of the power and value in this thing that I do, that so many others do; veterans and beginners, professionals and plebeians, genuine students of the realm of rational knowledge, and trolls alike.

But when I do look at the stats, I am reliably astounded by a feeling of hope that fills me with great joy to be part of this strange project called Humanity. What a time to be alive!

Of my current ~2700 Facebook “Likes”, here is the demographic breakdown by geography:

(There were also two viewers each from Venezuela [hope you guys are doing okay amidst the near-ruin your country faces; God bless you!] Estonia, Turkey, and Yemen!)

Now sure, these are only minuscule numbers compared to many more successful commentators than I, but the crucial component of this data is the breadth of distribution, not necessarily the volume.

Sometimes, in this age of technological wonder, we become anachronistic as to just how good we have it, and what amazing conveniences and powerful amenities our societies are continuing to perfect. We get caught up in the misery of our disagreements, and our fears for the future. I myself am guilty of this; we lose sight of not only the comforts that we enjoy, but the opportunities we have to completely change the game in our own favour; to not merely undermine, but rather completely bypass the gatekeepers of all our transactions. Every day the collective operationally linguistic genius of our species expands rapidly. Many of us who aren’t in software design, engineering, or Artificial Intelligence development don’t even have the vaguest notion of the ingenuity out there and constantly iterating and strengthening its neural pathways. Many of us speak more of the aesthetics of the world (truth, beauty, and love), rather than the technical, functional, and operationally rational – the language of autists, geeks, and (genuine) scientists.

This collective and amorphous genius I am referring to is the information realm. This realm is not strictly limited the internet at all – the internet is merely the complex series of channels between informational Nodes; human minds. We have, like it or not, formed a collective consciousness, and the internet is the first, but certainly not the best or last, inter-nodal superhighway system connecting practically every mind on the planet. Unless you read a lot of science fiction, or write it (as is my other passion project), you may not have considered the many ways in which this interconnection of the planets minds will manifest in the future, and the ways it will alter the directions of our cultures. Indeed, it already is.

Have you noticed though, that with every new app or social media platform that has brilliant plans to “set us free”, we always see a process of convergence and centralisation (as well as many nuisance forms of monetisation, which we always accept once we are addicted to the conveniences)? It seems to happen every time, and it is because we are using the internet on their terms (the puppet-masters) instead of as a genuine free market, because the cat is out of the bag, and every attempt at controlling the flow of information results in spontaneous expansion of informational genius to route around the dams.

The genie of this hive mind is out of the lamp. If you had one wish, what would it be?

For me, it’s global anarchy (but only on the internet). I don’t mean that as chaos, as many people have conflated it to mean. Chaos is something like what we have now, this tangled mess of billions of Nodes believing their ideas are of specific consequence. The genie is still learning to take a logical form. What I mean by anarchy, is a(n)– (without) –archy (rulers). No monarchs, no presidents, no executive boards, defamation leagues, media moguls, nanny-states, representative democracies, moral police, socialist-media gulags, or corporate cash-traps to stifle and monitor the everyday communications between the people of the world.

None of those dastardly gatekeepers we thought we needed, and we currently think we can’t control.

Actual photo of Google’s primary shareholder.

That said, I also want every nation to have a parallel national internet, which cannot be accessed from abroad, and does not contain any users or content who are located abroad, for the development and enrichment of each nation in competition with the open-borders global internet. Imagine if one particular nation (say Germany, China, or Norway) were to develop its own internet which was so vastly superior in content and messaging than the (potential) cesspool of the world’s totality of ideas, that it shaped and moulded the culture around it (as propaganda tends to) and helped to strengthen the unique identity of its homeland, and invited the envy and competition of those other nations who wish to demonstrably be the best! Some ideas may really be best left out of the memepool, but I believe that individuals should not be denied the choice. Whether or not that choice has legal consequences in the country is only the business of the rulers of those countries (be they ruled by the People or by Sovereigns). This is to say that I don’t deny that there will be countries who choose to make it an act of treason to access the global informational sphere (we are seeing this emerge in Australia and New Zealand with the blocking of Bitchute, Kiwifarms, and more sites which have been deemed beyond the pale.)

If I were the Sovereign ruler of a nation, I would certainly allow people the choice to access the planetary knowledge network, but I might ask them to prove their genuine heart-felt citizenship by regularly taking assessments that grant them license to the full privileges of being a citizen. Not every person would be a full citizen by right, they would need to earn it by continued positive participation in the good of the nation. Luckily for everyone who just shuddered at my bald-faced fascism, I will never be the sovereign ruler of a nation, and this precisely illustrates that my desires, designs, and wishes (and yours too, in fact) have infinitesimal bearing on the ways in which the nations of the planet and the newly forming informational nations are to be shaped and ruled.

Oswald Mosley receiving the European (Roman) salute by his “Black Shirts”, the British Union of Fascists (BUF), who fought desperately to prevent the Second World War and to restore Britain’s economic and political sovereignty and national identity, but who failed to reach the popular success of their ideological contemporaries in Italy and Germany, probably because they didn’t have Gab yet – circa 1936.

How can we make an impact in the shaping and direction of this amazing internet, and how can we enable disruptive permissionless innovation to continue to free us of the pursuits of the geographical rulers (Presidents and Chancellors) so that we can get through this chaotic global conflict and emerge into an optional binary state of cooperation, or separation, as we see fit. Imagine if each community, or each user, was their very own internet, or rather that the interface of your Node (your computer in the most traditional example) was a private server too, and you were able to be absolute monarch of your domain, and create whatever informational utopia you saw fit, and let the direct democracy of the informational free-market decide. It’s what we already do, I’m just talking about cutting out the middlemen.

We can firstly do this by subscribing to paywalled informational hubs which are already using new tools and services to bypass the Triad of Illiberal Orthodoxy; Google, Facebook, and Twitter. This is a painful process to implement at the individual level. We have each become so dependent on the technology, both in hardware and software, designed by a community consisting of California-based tech-nerds, who by-and-large have begun to swallow, espouse, and now even enforce, the political left’s globalist ideological and political biases. We have given them far too much power. These monopolies give us their amazing applications and services for “free”, but as we all know, freedom isn’t free, and it mostly certainly costs you more than a mere Buck-o-Five. It would seem to tragically turn out that the cost of giving all our information, all our connectivity, and all our eyeballs to these platform may be at the Recommended Retail Price of Your Soul, and gradually inflated to Your Children, Your Nation and ultimately, Your World. New software developers are trying transparent and innovative monetisation methods, including cheap all-access subscriptions, cryptocurrency payment systems, and even internal economies (with credits only usable within the particular informational nation).

There is always an array of disruptive competitors who recognise the market forces at play and wish to fulfil your need for privacy, autonomy, and protection against any uninvited indoctrination. Meeting these emerging needs of the third generation to live in the age of the internet (who are so much more worldly than we millennials could have ever hoped to be), is the primary focus of all new content and software creators who plan on still existing in another ten years time.

In this wonderful world of global inter-connectivity, we need to support the development of new systems which subvert and bypass the gatekeepers. These include new social media apps like Gab.ai, Minds.com, MeWe.com, and the forthcoming rebooted Social Galactic. These include atomised and independent video content delivery systems, be they open social platforms like Bitchute, or private curated on-demand and live-streaming “stations” like Unauthorized.TV, RationalRise.TV, and yes, even Netflix (though I have ended my subscription for this enterprise and encourage you to as well, for its deep and dark subversion of our culture ala Big Brother’s output mind-control content in Orwell’s 1984). These also include revolutionary new models for connectivity and collaboration, such as block-chain technology, most directly evident in BitCoin and its various wannabe competitors, and the Holochain project (for which my friend Moritz Bierling is a developer and advocate).

Bitcoin seems to be mostly flourishing as a currency for trade, and for purchasing license to the information held in other content creators’ server spaces, and perhaps it will triumph as the free global currency of this future iteration of the internet which I am prescribing. That would be an amazing triumph for such a revolutionary technology.

6 Years of historical Bitcoin data, on a logarithmic graph.

The internet is the connecting “matrix” for this informational territory, the hive mind, which actually exists in flesh as neuronal excitations (tiny sparks of electrical energy being blasted as a sort of high speed ‘morse code’ though our Central Nervous System) and inhibitions (the slowing of these action potentials) happening in unfathomable quantities within each and every human and animal brain on the planet.

The information sphere is the one territory in which I see successful international, yes, and even multicultural, co-existence. Sure, some are trying to take a huge steaming dump on that right now, but that is the parasitic, totalitarian Left, who will be wiped off the planet soon enough, until they re-emerge over generations and eventually grovel their way back to influence.

I chat to and receive daily emails from libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, Alt-Righters, Stalinist communists, socialists, white ethno-nationalists, Christian nationalists, Propertarians, preppers, moonies, moon-landing-sceptics, spherical-earth adherents, flat-earth theorists, soldiers, farmers, craftspeople, writers, publishers, YouTubers, artists, musicians, atheists, Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Daoists, Zionists, Anti-Zionists, Australians, Americans, Englishmen, Scotsmen, et. al., as well as Eastern Europeans, Russians, Chinese, Indians, Brazilians, Africans, Germans, Koreans, Japanese, etc. etc. etc.

Kum ba yah, brah!

These daily communiques are positive (though sometimes positively disagreeable) conversations, exchanges, debates, jokes, memes, scriptures, dreams, compliments, and heart-felt well-wishes from people all over the planet. I encounter some occasional rudeness, or attempts to undermine, ridicule, shame, or threaten me, and I’m sure you’ve experienced the same. I don’t keep the pipes to those Nodes open, because those Nodes are leaking toxins into the hive mind and we must deprive them of their access to other Nodes until they learn to behave themselves in a mutually agreeable manner. Isn’t it great that we can do that? In the informational sphere, it is actually possible to be as bullet-proof, as anti-fragile, as Neo in The Matrix.

The slings and arrows of trolls and gammas have no power over the man armoured with reason and fortified with logic.”
– I just made that up now.

We have in our hands the greatest tool ever invented for the international collaboration of all peoples on earth. And we normal, healthy, non-ideologically-possessed human beings, no matter where we’re from, we regular users, are trying every day to strengthen the marketplace of information on that potentially Edenic cyberland. The innovators are creating bypasses around all the off-ramps that have proven to be pitfalls, and we must escape the clutches of the gatekeepers, by having the courage to take our daily Red Honk pills and support these new breakaway communities and disruptive technologies. The Arab Spring would not have happened without Facebook. Brexit would not have happened without Twitter and YouTube. What will Gab and Minds and Social Galactic succeed to bring about?

Don’t you see that there has never been a better time to subvert the subverters? Revolution can happen on any fronts we choose, and the internet should not be the last or least of these, because it is perhaps our greatest worldly treasure.

When we begin to adapt the internet to be less of a chaotic, sprawling bazaar, and more of a planned city, with privately controlled houses around each Node (human mind), then we will begin to see the incredible potential of unmolested informational flow between every nation, faction, township, family, and mind. Then we will witness unimaginable miracles of science and come to understand the ways in which voluntary association and open competition can truly propel the entire world forward; each nation only at its own pace (it’s time to put the Boomers into aged care facilities and stop letting them spread their “peace and democracy” at gunpoint to the whole world, no?)

Go (back to the nursing) home Grandma and Grandpa, you’re both drunk (with power)!

This is only one imagining of the kind of connectivity that is possible, and a very cursory one at that. There is myriad fiction and non-fiction books, code, and engineering designs already in existence which better attest to the near infinitude of possibility for where the “information super-highway” (that’s Boomer-speak for “the Matrix”) can take us. Driving this technological innovation will enable a renaissance for the whole world. We often hear the internet likened to the Gutenberg press in its power to revolutionise the education of the polity. But the Gutenberg press was only the beginning. Now we all have full colour printers in our homes. We’re starting to own 3D printers. We’ve moved way beyond physical limitations. The information flows freer than ever! The internet is so much bigger that the Gutenberg press was, and the renaissance it is bringing is exponentially larger still.

Information is power, and while we all face restrictions on our physical and financial movement in the material world, in the information realm we all have the potential to be truly free. The more we excite the action potentials in the neurons of the collective mind, through stimuli like resistance, heat, and sometimes total severance from toxic Nodes and Hubs, the more we can assist this informational super-being in developing robust and geometrically stable neural pathways, and the more genius our species can become.

You can support our new video on-demand and streaming service at RationalRise.TV

Should convicted “paedovores” be burnt alive? or, See; We can make New Words too!

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.”

Raskolnikov, from Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Crime & Punishment”

This quote is a favourite decontextualised soundbite on the web. Those who have read the classic Russian novel of course know that this theme of new words is taken from Rodion Raskolnikov’s essay in which he justifies the amorality of the exceptional; the dispensing with moral principles by those who prove themselves worthy and willing to act without limit in the pursuit of revolution. Dostoevsky readers also know that, while brilliantly composed and not without shades of truth, Raskalnikov wrote this piece while descending into a murderous insanity.

Have you noticed how much the Regressive Left love to assert their “progress” by inventing such New Words? It’s not enough to be male or female anymore; now we must clarify whether we are cis- male, or trans- male. It’s no longer acceptable to simply be sceptical of the catastrophic effects of this spurious scientific orthodoxy known as “climate change”. You are a climate change denier. Contempt for the barbarism practised and preached in accordance with the Islamic Qur’an is now called Islamophobia, and the adherence to a Biblical view of sex and marriage is now called homophobia. Like so many of the terms which divide and vilify the natural and Christian worldviews, these are all new words.

The distortion of language through indoctrination via academia, entertainment, and news media, has proven to be the first line of offence from the Cultural Marxists in their insatiable march through our institutions and our culture, towards the coming ultimate Luciferian depravity. They failed to win by overt conquest with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but fortunately they had already gained their replacement stronghold in the West, through covert subversion. The intergenerational project of Marxism has been sickeningly successful in the latter part of the 20th century, and people are only becoming wise to it now that we are deep into the 21st.

Many on the Conservative Christian Right expend their energies trying to conserve our language and preserve the meanings of the words that define our Western worldview. But many are beginning to realise that this battle is being quickly lost, and that we must fight on the front presented to us, not the one in distant past. In the immortal words of George Carlin:

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

And so as Christians, Right-Wingers, Nationalists, and Patriots, we must meet our enemy where they stand, and harness control of the words that they so skilfully use against us.

Consider the term given to those who sexually prey upon children:

paedophilia (n.)

1900, from Greek pais (genitive paidos) “child” (see pedo-) + philos “loving” see -phile). First attested in an abstract of a report by Krafft-Ebing.


The term is quite new, though this scourge of sexual depravity against the most vulnerable and innocent among us has surely existed much, much longer. The name was chosen by one man in particular.

Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing (1840-1902; full name Richard Fridolin Joseph Freiherr Krafft von Festenberg auf Frohnberg, genannt von Ebing) was an Austro–German psychiatrist and author of the foundational work Psychopathia Sexualis (1886).


Why Philia? Surely this must have been a mistake… after all, the word originally meant love, and was used in the Bible to describe the love amongst the disciples of Jesus!

philia word-forming element meaning “friendship, fondness, tendency toward,” and in recent use “abnormal attraction to,” from Greek philia “affection,” from philos “loving,” which is of uncertain origin. Related: -philic.


Indeed, Philia is one of the four Greek words for love, each of which feature in the Bible.


“Brotherly love”, and a term used in chemical science to describe chemical attractions that bind various molecules together, or draw them towards each other (e.g. hydrophiles). There is an implication of mutuality, and this is the term used to the describe the brotherly love within the Church; the love of thy fellow brethren in Christ – that irresistible connection you might feel with a stranger who is of similar genetic stock, or of similar religious or ideological persuasion.


Or “affection” as C.S. Lewis called it, is the love that is developed between genuine kin; family members, close friends, and even pets. It is a love that is shared between two or more people who are in close regular contact with one another – less universal than philia.


The highest and most pure love, the love of God for His church, and of Christ for His disciples. Sacrificial, selfless, spiritual love. Think Jesus on the cross. The love we Christians strive to feel and express for our Lord, and with the blessings of the Holy Spirit, a love we might get to experience in small doses and rare moments of connection with our Creator.


Romantic or sexual love; the love felt between a husband and wife. In the strict Biblical sense, this is quite a separate concept from lust (epithumeó) and the basic animal desires that might be attributed to sexual desire outside of a Biblical heterosexual marriage – though of course we all know that the term has long been co-opted to mean “anything that turns you on”, devoid of morality, religion, natural law, or any kind of legitimate love.

Do any of these terms appropriately fit the bill of someone who has an uncontrollable sexual lust for those who are too young to procreate, and too young to consent? I believe not.

I don’t know if others already use this term, but a friend of mine just coined (for me) the term paedovore (or pedovore, for the Americans) to replace the euphemistic “paedophile”. I love children, especially my own, but I am not what we commonly regard as a paedophile (though, in the technical linguistic sense, that’s what all who love children are, including Jesus Christ himself). It would seem that in the strictest use of this relatively new term, the word is wrong!

Paedophilia is commonly understood to mean a sexual desire for children, and given that this cannot be consensual (for children lack the biological requisites for procreation and the neurological development for full agency), and if enacted does irreparable and immeasurable damage to the child and society, it is better framed as a consumption instead of a –philic love (which if applied properly refers to something which of course is entirely wholesome). This euphemistic language is part of why it is apt to be reclassified today as a legitimate sexual preference, and not the sick and damnable disease that it is, worthy in the eyes of many of summary execution when acted upon.

Does this sound far-fetched? Don’t take my word for it. Check out these headlines (articles linked):

The Telegraph: ‘Paedophilia is natural and normal for males’

Independent: Paedophilia a ‘sexual orientation – like being straight or gay’

Wikipedia: North American Man/Boy Love Association

Here’s a list on Wikipedia of all the known groups worldwide committed to celebrating and legalising sexual activity with children. You might be surprised at just how many there are, and given that they have logos and legal organisation names, as well as this published directory, they are not exactly trembling in the shadows:

List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations

The evidence is clear: there is a growing worldwide movement to normalise paedophilia, largely spearheaded by social scientists (on behalf of the sick men who wish to abolish age of consent laws and allow children ‘freedom to choose’), who make the claim that the desire is an unchosen affliction (quite possibly true) but that the demonisation of the desire makes it impossible for the paedophile to come forward for fear of being ostracised or even harmed. Yes, once again, the potential perpetrator is being framed as the victim. The depravity of Social Justice knows no bounds.

Now I don’t believe that this is entirely without truth. It would seem from what we understand that paedophiles may indeed have different brain matter to people who have a normal non-sexual love for children, and they may not be able to control themselves. It may not be a disease at all, but rather an incurable mental defect. So how do we know the difference between those with self-control and those without? These social scientists would have you believe that by creating an inclusive society that treats paedophilia as a normal and acceptable desire, so long as it is not acted upon, we will see fewer crimes committed against innocent children, and more paedophiles seeking psychological care, or permanent solutions like voluntary isolation or chemical castration.

Really? Do we really think that’s where this rapidly progressive, “inclusive” society is headed?

(Look at his Dad. LOOK.)

It wasn’t long after this sexually-enabling appearance on Good Morning America that “Desmond is Amazing”, the “pioneering” drag-kid was filmed dancing in a gay strip club, after dark, for dollar bills. Why are the mainstream media and so many “social scientists” pushing so hard to normalise the sexualisation of children? Surely this can’t be helping those afflicted with the neurological defect we currently call paedophilia.

We have all heard the stories of what goes on in the pools and mansions of Hollywood. We know about what happened to the two Coreys (Feldman and Haim). We know that child sex trafficking is a lucrative business at the (still wide open) US-Mexican border. We know about Jimmy Savile in the UK. We know that the BBC covered for him.

The very walls of BBC buildings in the UK still hold the questionable artworks of known sexual deviant and child-abuser, Eric Gill.

“Prospero and Ariel” sculpture by Eric Gill, Broadcasting House, London.

While the hyper-feminine social engineers want to ensure that we infantilise and make victims out of those who would harm children (while at the same time “believing all women” and claiming there is a “rape culture” in Western nations, where there simply is not – go further East to find the real rape cultures), there are plenty of men in the West who would happily deal with this another way.

Curt Doolittle from the Propertarian Institute suggests less carrot, more stick, and I’m inclined to agree:

–The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla–
From The Propertarian Institute’s website.
… a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.
… b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.
The criteria therefore is:
… i) obsessive or exclusive interest
… ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age.
… iii) by those 16 years of age or older
… iv) and at least five years older.
These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:
… a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.
… b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.
… b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.
… c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.
… d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.
… e) natural experimentation between pubescents.
… f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.
… g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.
… a) consumption of child pornography
… b) obsession in attention, speech, collection
… b) molestation
… c) co-morbidity
… … deficits in response inhibition,
… … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.
… … failed lateralization (ie: they’re feminine)
… … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)
“Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no, and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)
… a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)
… b) developmental trauma (Trigger)
… c) brain trauma (Trigger)
The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.
… a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity
… b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm
… d) Externality – produces vast externalities
… d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible
… e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court:
… … Because the Law must:
… … … Provide restitution
… … … Provide punishment
… … … Prevent repetition or expansion
It is the judgment of the law that:
Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.
Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution
To those incapable of self defence,
And unable to engage in reciprocity,
Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defence of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.
Pedophiles who signal risk, by:
… a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking)
… b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography
… c) molestation
… d) association with one another
… e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above
Shall be permanently removed from the population by:
… i) death by burning for molestation
… i) death by hanging for all other violations
… ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps)
… i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm;
… i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence.
… ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence.
false accusation is:
… a) harmful to the accused
… b) exposes the accused to risk of death
… c) produces vast externalities whether or not true
… d) is closed to restitution
… a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution, ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused.
–This is the Law–

(From: Propertarian Institute Website)

This piece of legal writing was lifted from a social media post by Curt, and is part of the larger body of work he is currently completing with others at the Propertarian Institute; the writing of a new Constitution aiming to complete the scientific method and create a document defining the Natural Law.

In Curt Doolittle’s own words:

“Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.”

Curt Doolittle, Propertarian Institute, Kiev

I’m flattered to see that my comment on that post was incorporated into the website article:

The beauty of this piece of law is that:
Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely.
So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society.
If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

Comment by James Fox Higgins

Civilisation has become feminised to the point of it being unsafe for our children. Laws have become relative in the social justice mode, no longer colour- or class-blind, but now, entirely inverted to protect the wicked, and often punish the innocent. A return to the masculine (dare I say, patriarchal) origins of Western law and norms, one that is intolerant in the extreme – violently so – seems to be the sensible and likely effective recourse for this madness that has turned America, Europe, and soon Australia, into the new Sodom and Gomorrah.

Whether you agree with the harsh stick of Propertarianism’s Natural Law or not, perhaps you would agree that we should at least call the affliction by a proper name, and I don’t think paedophilia cuts it, etymologically or symbolically. After all, as the truism often attributed to Socrates states:

The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms


Are paedophiles actually pederasts (pedo-, child + eros, sexual love)? Or shall we use the Biblical understanding of eros as a divine and true sexual love, and not a mere animal lust and malevolence, to inform us?

I would argue that, in the spirit of the linguistic and rhetorical battleground to which we have been driven by agents of Satan, these purveyors of the lies at the heart of the Social Justice movement, we must take the offensive, and brand those with the desire to corrupt the innocence of children with their depraved and highly destructive lust with a name as insidious as the fallout of their crimes: they are the eaters of children. They are Kindlifresser.

They are paedovores.

Kindlifresser or the child eater fountain in Bern, Switzerland.